1124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907345)
21. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla.
Cheng AS; Pegg TJ; Karamitsos TD; Searle N; Jerosch-Herold M; Choudhury RP; Banning AP; Neubauer S; Robson MD; Selvanayagam JB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 49(25):2440-9. PubMed ID: 17599608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High-resolution free-breathing automated quantitative myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease.
Crawley R; Kunze KP; Milidonis X; Highton J; McElroy S; Frey SM; Hoefler D; Karamanli C; Wong NCK; Backhaus SJ; Alskaf E; Neji R; Scannell CM; Plein S; Chiribiri A
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; 25(7):914-925. PubMed ID: 38525948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis.
Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic value of global myocardial perfusion reserve assessment based on coronary sinus flow measurements using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in addition to myocardial stress perfusion imaging.
Shomanova Z; Florian A; Bietenbeck M; Waltenberger J; Sechtem U; Yilmaz A
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(8):851-859. PubMed ID: 28369259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?
Joutsiniemi E; Saraste A; Pietilä M; Mäki M; Kajander S; Ukkonen H; Airaksinen J; Knuuti J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 24408930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stress Perfusion Coronary Flow Reserve Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Known or Suspected CAD.
Kato S; Saito N; Nakachi T; Fukui K; Iwasawa T; Taguri M; Kosuge M; Kimura K
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 70(7):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Feuchtner G; Goetti R; Plass A; Wieser M; Scheffel H; Wyss C; Stolzmann P; Donati O; Schnabl J; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Cury RC
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods.
Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Dweck MR; Alam S; Cooper A; Mirsadraee S; Newby DE; Semple SI
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Sep; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 27624746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Hussain ST; Chiribiri A; Morton G; Bettencourt N; Schuster A; Paul M; Perera D; Nagel E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Jul; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 27430288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population.
Liga R; Vontobel J; Rovai D; Marinelli M; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Chiappino D; Marraccini P; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Filardi PP; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Stehli J; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Underwood SR; Knuuti J; Kaufmann PA; Neglia D; Gaemperli O;
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 17(9):951-60. PubMed ID: 26992419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.
Nakanishi R; Matsumoto S; Alani A; Li D; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Koo BK; Min JK; Budoff MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25904402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enhanced diagnostic utility achieved by myocardial blood analysis: A meta-analysis of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the detection of functional coronary artery disease.
Dai N; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Hou L; Li W; Fan B; Zhang T; Xu Y
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():665-73. PubMed ID: 27423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship of vasodilator-induced changes in myocardial oxygenation with the severity of coronary artery stenosis: a study using oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Luu JM; Friedrich MG; Harker J; Dwyer N; Guensch D; Mikami Y; Faris P; Hare JL
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1358-67. PubMed ID: 25104812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location: quantitative analysis of transmural perfusion gradients by high-resolution MRI versus FFR.
Chiribiri A; Hautvast GL; Lockie T; Schuster A; Bigalke B; Olivotti L; Redwood SR; Breeuwer M; Plein S; Nagel E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 May; 6(5):600-9. PubMed ID: 23582358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Navigator-gated 3D blood oxygen level-dependent CMR at 3.0-T for detection of stress-induced myocardial ischemic reactions.
Jahnke C; Gebker R; Manka R; Schnackenburg B; Fleck E; Paetsch I
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Apr; 3(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 20394899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography study.
Thompson AG; Raju R; Blanke P; Yang TH; Mancini GB; Budoff MJ; Norgaard BL; Min JK; Leipsic JA
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 25819194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
