1139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907345)
41. Stable patients with suspected myocardial ischemia: comparison of machine-learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect myocardial ischemia.
Lossnitzer D; Klenantz S; Andre F; Goerich J; Schoepf UJ; Pazzo KL; Sommer A; Brado M; Gückel F; Sokiranski R; Becher T; Akin I; Buss SJ; Baumann S
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):34. PubMed ID: 35120459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.
Mordini FE; Haddad T; Hsu LY; Kellman P; Lowrey TB; Aletras AH; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24433707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Machine learning assessment of myocardial ischemia using angiography: Development and retrospective validation.
Hae H; Kang SJ; Kim WJ; Choi SY; Lee JG; Bae Y; Cho H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Lee CH; Kang DY; Lee PH; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
PLoS Med; 2018 Nov; 15(11):e1002693. PubMed ID: 30422987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by T2-prepared steady-state free precession blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to fractional flow reserve.
Walcher T; Manzke R; Hombach V; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J; Bernhardt P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 22855554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The assessment of ischaemic burden: validation of a functional jeopardy score against cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.
Hussain ST; Morton G; De Silva K; Jogiya R; Schuster A; Paul M; Perera D; Nagel E
Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 106(4):259-270. PubMed ID: 27766423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic performance of 3D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion in elderly patients for the detection of coronary artery disease as compared to fractional flow reserve.
Károlyi M; Gotschy A; Polacin M; Plein S; Paetsch I; Jahnke C; Frick M; Gebker R; Alkadhi H; Kozerke S; Manka R
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):339-347. PubMed ID: 35984513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR?
Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical feasibility of accelerated, high spatial resolution myocardial perfusion imaging.
Manka R; Vitanis V; Boesiger P; Flammer AJ; Plein S; Kozerke S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 20633848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.
Ponte M; Bettencourt N; Pereira E; Ferreira ND; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Albuquerque A; Gama V; Nagel E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30(8):1589-97. PubMed ID: 25082645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of 1.5T and 3T Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Detecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
Min JY; Ko SM; Song IY; Yi JG; Hwang HK; Shin JK
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1007-1020. PubMed ID: 30386133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.
Melikian N; De Bondt P; Tonino P; De Winter O; Wyffels E; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Fearon WF; Pijls NH; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 3(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20298990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion reserve quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla in comparison to quantitative coronary angiography.
Ikuye K; Buckert D; Schaaf L; Walcher T; Rottbauer W; Bernhardt P
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Mar; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 23537061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Recent Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparative Study With 3-T Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Layland J; Rauhalammi S; Watkins S; Ahmed N; McClure J; Lee MM; Carrick D; O'Donnell A; Sood A; Petrie MC; May VT; Eteiba H; Lindsay M; McEntegart M; Oldroyd KG; Radjenovic A; Berry C
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(8):e002207. PubMed ID: 26253733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Combined non-invasive functional and anatomical diagnostic work-up in clinical practice: the magnetic resonance and computed tomography in suspected coronary artery disease (MARCC) study.
Groothuis JG; Beek AM; Brinckman SL; Meijerink MR; van den Oever ML; Hofman MB; van Kuijk C; van Rossum AC
Eur Heart J; 2013 Jul; 34(26):1990-8. PubMed ID: 23475530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR
Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
