1124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907345)
61. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy.
Sejr-Hansen M; Westra J; Winther S; Tu S; Nissen L; Gormsen L; Petersen SE; Ejlersen J; Isaksen C; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 36(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 31745744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.
Gonzalez JA; Lipinski MJ; Flors L; Shaw PW; Kramer CM; Salerno M
Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26347004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Application of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Hirose K; Chikamori T; Hida S; Tanaka N; Yamashita J; Igarashi Y; Saitoh T; Tanaka H; Yamashina A
J Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 71(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 29183566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease.
Sakuma H; Ishida M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 21(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 34108304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements.
Ben Bouallègue F; Roubille F; Lattuca B; Cung TT; Macia JC; Gervasoni R; Leclercq F; Mariano-Goulart D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1712-7. PubMed ID: 26338893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol.
Bernhardt P; Spiess J; Levenson B; Pilz G; Höfling B; Hombach V; Strohm O
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1292-300. PubMed ID: 19909933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Stress Myocardial Perfusion CT in Patients Suspected of Having Coronary Artery Disease: Visual and Quantitative Analysis-Validation by Using Fractional Flow Reserve.
Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kang JW; Han D; Jung J; Kim N; Lee JB; Ahn JM; Lee JY; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Lim TH
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 25880262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparing stress testing and fractional flow reserve to evaluate presence, location and extent of ischemia in coronary artery disease.
Pattanshetty DJ; Bhat PK; Gandhi S; Pillai DP; Aneja A
Indian Heart J; 2015; 67(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 25820051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging.
Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Kim MY; Shin JK; Ko SM
Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 29320864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Kang JW; Kang SJ; Kweon J; Kim HJ; Lim TH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial magnetic resonance perfusion to diagnose ischemic stenosis with fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li M; Zhou T; Yang LF; Peng ZH; Ding J; Sun G
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1098-105. PubMed ID: 25306540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.
Klem I; Greulich S; Heitner JF; Kim H; Vogelsberg H; Kispert EM; Ambati SR; Bruch C; Parker M; Judd RM; Kim RJ; Sechtem U
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jul; 1(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 19356464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.
Leone AM; Scalone G; De Maria GL; Tagliaferro F; Gardi A; Clemente F; Basile E; Cialdella P; De Caterina AR; Porto I; Aurigemma C; Burzotta F; Niccoli G; Trani C; Rebuzzi AG; Crea F
EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 25007836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Rationale and Design of the CREDENCE Trial: computed TomogRaphic evaluation of atherosclerotic DEtermiNants of myocardial IsChEmia.
Rizvi A; Hartaigh BÓ; Knaapen P; Leipsic J; Shaw LJ; Andreini D; Pontone G; Raman S; Khan MA; Ridner M; Nabi F; Gimelli A; Jang J; Cole J; Nakazato R; Zarins C; Han D; Lee JH; Szymonifika J; Gomez MJ; Truong QA; Chang HJ; Lin FY; Min JK
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Oct; 16(1):190. PubMed ID: 27716131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. High-resolution versus standard-resolution cardiovascular MR myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease.
Motwani M; Maredia N; Fairbairn TA; Kozerke S; Radjenovic A; Greenwood JP; Plein S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May; 5(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 22499848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain.
Thomas DM; Larson CW; Cheezum MK; Villines TC; Branch KR; Blankstein R; Cury RC; Slim AM
South Med J; 2015 Nov; 108(11):688-94. PubMed ID: 26539951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
