149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907617)
1. Effects of display complexity on location and feature inhibition.
Hu FK; Fan Z; Samuel AG; He S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1619-32. PubMed ID: 23907617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment.
Hu FK; Samuel AG; Chan AS
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 21171801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.
Hu K; Zhan J; Li B; He S; Samuel AG
Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():73-81. PubMed ID: 24907677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: inhibition of return or repetition blindness?
Fox E; de Fockert JW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Aug; 27(4):798-812. PubMed ID: 11518144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Levels of neuroticism can predict attentional performance during cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
Cai B; He H; Wang A; Zhang M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 36253587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Location and shape in inhibition of return.
Riggio L; Patteri I; Umiltà C
Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 12827352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cue repetition increases inhibition of return.
Dukewich KR; Boehnke SE
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 18973792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facilitation versus inhibition in non-spatial attribute discrimination tasks.
Hu FK; Samuel AG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):784-96. PubMed ID: 21264703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining the effect of practice on inhibition of return in static displays.
Pratt J; McAuliffe J
Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):756-65. PubMed ID: 10370341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm.
Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.
Visser TA; Barnes D
Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):532-44. PubMed ID: 20182742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention.
Giesbrecht B; Woldorff MG; Song AW; Mangun GR
Neuroimage; 2003 Jul; 19(3):496-512. PubMed ID: 12880783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space.
Maylor EA; Hockey R
Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(1A):41-54. PubMed ID: 3574649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
Francis L; Milliken B
Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contribution of general and specific motor inhibitory sets to the so-called auditory inhibition of return.
Tassinari G; Campara D; Benedetti C; Berlucchi G
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 12355281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibition or facilitation of return: Does chromatic component count?
do Canto-Pereira LH; Paramei GV; Morya E; Ranvaud RD
Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):489-93. PubMed ID: 16961985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
