These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907849)

  • 21. Effects of Leaflet Design on Transvalvular Gradients of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.
    Dabiri Y; Ronsky J; Ali I; Basha A; Bhanji A; Narine K
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Dec; 7(4):363-373. PubMed ID: 27573761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aortic root stiffness affects the kinematics of bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Jahren SE; Winkler BM; Heinisch PP; Wirz J; Carrel T; Obrist D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Feb; 24(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 27680580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fundamental mechanics of aortic heart valve closure.
    Hose DR; Narracott AJ; Penrose JM; Baguley D; Jones IP; Lawford PV
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):958-67. PubMed ID: 16488234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting ATS Open Pivot heart valve performance with computational fluid dynamics.
    Dumont K; Vierendeels JA; Segers P; Van Nooten GJ; Verdonck PR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 15974535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
    Bottio T; Buratto E; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics of pulsatile blood flow through the curved bileaflet mechanical heart valve installed in two different types of blood vessels: velocity and pressure of blood flow.
    Bang JS; Yoo SM; Kim CN
    ASAIO J; 2006; 52(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16760710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet deformation monitored by double-pulse stereo photogrammetry.
    Gao BZ; Pandya S; Arana C; Hwang NH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Jan; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11878276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Image-based immersed boundary model of the aortic root.
    Hasan A; Kolahdouz EM; Enquobahrie A; Caranasos TG; Vavalle JP; Griffith BE
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():72-84. PubMed ID: 28778565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. A preliminary study.
    Sung HW; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Le TN; Yoganathan AP; Quijano RC
    ASAIO Trans; 1991; 37(3):M172-4. PubMed ID: 1751097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flat or curved pericardial aortic valve cusps: a finite element study.
    Lim KH; Candra J; Yeo JH; Duran CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 15473482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations.
    Kim H; Chandran KB; Sacks MS; Lu J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 17089074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations.
    Howard IC; Patterson EA; Yoxall A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(6):259-66. PubMed ID: 14602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fluid-Structure Interaction Model of a Percutaneous Aortic Valve: Comparison with an In Vitro Test and Feasibility Study in a Patient-Specific Case.
    Wu W; Pott D; Mazza B; Sironi T; Dordoni E; Chiastra C; Petrini L; Pennati G; Dubini G; Steinseifer U; Sonntag S; Kuetting M; Migliavacca F
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Feb; 44(2):590-603. PubMed ID: 26294009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 3-D simulation of the St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve opening process: fluid-structure interaction study and experimental validation.
    Redaelli A; Bothorel H; Votta E; Soncini M; Morbiducci U; Del Gaudio C; Balducci A; Grigioni M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):804-13. PubMed ID: 15473484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve.
    Garcia D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
    J Biomech; 2005 Jun; 38(6):1303-11. PubMed ID: 15863115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Numerical model of the aortic root and valve: optimization of graft size and sinotubular junction to annulus ratio.
    Marom G; Halevi R; Haj-Ali R; Rosenfeld M; Schäfers HJ; Raanani E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1227-31. PubMed ID: 23402688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: surgical consideration.
    Matsue H; Sawa Y; Takahashi T; Matsumiya G; Ohtake S; Hamada S; Ueguchi T; Matsuda H
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):60-6. PubMed ID: 11805951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A model of the geometrical changes in aortic valve leaflets in response to leaflet extension and variable boundary conditions.
    Fisher J; Butterfield M; Lockie KJ; Davies GA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1992; 206(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 1418197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.