These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907984)
1. Chemical footprint: a methodological framework for bridging life cycle assessment and planetary boundaries for chemical pollution. Sala S; Goralczyk M Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):623-32. PubMed ID: 23907984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment. Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating legacy contaminants and emerging chemicals in marine environments using adverse outcome pathways and biological effects-directed analysis. Hutchinson TH; Lyons BP; Thain JE; Law RJ Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 23820191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Rebitzer G; Ekvall T; Frischknecht R; Hunkeler D; Norris G; Rydberg T; Schmidt WP; Suh S; Weidema BP; Pennington DW Environ Int; 2004 Jul; 30(5):701-20. PubMed ID: 15051246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries. Sala S; Crenna E; Secchi M; Sanyé-Mengual E J Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 269():110686. PubMed ID: 32560978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advancing water footprint assessments: Combining the impacts of water pollution and scarcity. Pierrat É; Laurent A; Dorber M; Rygaard M; Verones F; Hauschild M Sci Total Environ; 2023 Apr; 870():161910. PubMed ID: 36736405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Life Cycle Assessment support to environmental ambitions of EU policies and the Sustainable Development Goals. Sanyé-Mengual E; Sala S Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Sep; 18(5):1221-1232. PubMed ID: 35112502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution. Diamond ML; de Wit CA; Molander S; Scheringer M; Backhaus T; Lohmann R; Arvidsson R; Bergman Å; Hauschild M; Holoubek I; Persson L; Suzuki N; Vighi M; Zetzsch C Environ Int; 2015 May; 78():8-15. PubMed ID: 25679962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the environmental sustainability performance of global supply chains: A multi-regional input-output analysis for carbon, sulphur oxide and water footprints. Acquaye A; Feng K; Oppon E; Salhi S; Ibn-Mohammed T; Genovese A; Hubacek K J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():571-585. PubMed ID: 27876164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS". Dumreicher H J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(2):204-15. PubMed ID: 17888563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of new scientific developments in regulatory risk assessments: challenges and opportunities. Tarazona JV Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e85-91. PubMed ID: 23625625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. Laurent A; Olsen SI; Hauschild MZ Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(7):4100-8. PubMed ID: 22443866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations. Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management. Moore MN; Depledge MH; Readman JW; Paul Leonard DR Mutat Res; 2004 Aug; 552(1-2):247-68. PubMed ID: 15288556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. Huang YA; Weber CL; Matthews HS Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(22):8509-15. PubMed ID: 20028044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims. Galic N; Hommen U; Baveco JM; van den Brink PJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):338-60. PubMed ID: 20821698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs. Vanham D; Leip A; Galli A; Kastner T; Bruckner M; Uwizeye A; van Dijk K; Ercin E; Dalin C; Brandão M; Bastianoni S; Fang K; Leach A; Chapagain A; Van der Velde M; Sala S; Pant R; Mancini L; Monforti-Ferrario F; Carmona-Garcia G; Marques A; Weiss F; Hoekstra AY Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133642. PubMed ID: 31635013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental risk assessment of combined effects in aquatic ecotoxicology: a discussion paper. Beyer J; Petersen K; Song Y; Ruus A; Grung M; Bakke T; Tollefsen KE Mar Environ Res; 2014 May; 96():81-91. PubMed ID: 24246633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Climate-based archetypes for the environmental fate assessment of chemicals. Ciuffo B; Sala S J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():435-43. PubMed ID: 23999273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the nitrogen footprint fit for purpose? An assessment of models and proposed uses. Einarsson R; Cederberg C J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 240():198-208. PubMed ID: 30939400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]