BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23908136)

  • 1. Evolutionary active transposable elements in the genome of the coelacanth.
    Chalopin D; Fan S; Simakov O; Meyer A; Schartl M; Volff JN
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2014 Sep; 322(6):322-33. PubMed ID: 23908136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcriptional activity of transposable elements in coelacanth.
    Forconi M; Chalopin D; Barucca M; Biscotti MA; De Moro G; Galiana D; Gerdol M; Pallavicini A; Canapa A; Olmo E; Volff JN
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2014 Sep; 322(6):379-89. PubMed ID: 24038780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interspecies insertion polymorphism analysis reveals recent activity of transposable elements in extant coelacanths.
    Naville M; Chalopin D; Volff JN
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114382. PubMed ID: 25470617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of transposable elements highlights mobilome diversity and evolution in vertebrates.
    Chalopin D; Naville M; Plard F; Galiana D; Volff JN
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Jan; 7(2):567-80. PubMed ID: 25577199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The coelacanth: Can a "living fossil" have active transposable elements in its genome?
    Naville M; Chalopin D; Casane D; Laurenti P; Volff JN
    Mob Genet Elements; 2015; 5(4):55-59. PubMed ID: 26442185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jumping the fine LINE between species: horizontal transfer of transposable elements in animals catalyses genome evolution.
    Ivancevic AM; Walsh AM; Kortschak RD; Adelson DL
    Bioessays; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1071-82. PubMed ID: 24003001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural and evolutionary analyses of the Ty3/gypsy group of LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Anopheles gambiae.
    Tubío JM; Naveira H; Costas J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 15356275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A living fossil in the genome of a living fossil: Harbinger transposons in the coelacanth genome.
    Smith JJ; Sumiyama K; Amemiya CT
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Mar; 29(3):985-93. PubMed ID: 22045999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genome reflects a recent history of biased accumulation of transposable elements.
    Staton SE; Bakken BH; Blackman BK; Chapman MA; Kane NC; Tang S; Ungerer MC; Knapp SJ; Rieseberg LH; Burke JM
    Plant J; 2012 Oct; 72(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 22691070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey of long terminal repeat retrotransposons of domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori).
    Jin-Shan X; Qing-You X; Jun L; Guo-Qing P; Ze-Yang Z
    Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2005 Aug; 35(8):921-9. PubMed ID: 15944087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-LTR retrotransposons in the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae: unprecedented diversity and evidence of recent activity.
    Biedler J; Tu Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Nov; 20(11):1811-25. PubMed ID: 12832632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling the determinants of transposable elements dynamics in vertebrate genomes using empirical evidences and simulations.
    Bourgeois Y; Ruggiero RP; Hariyani I; Boissinot S
    PLoS Genet; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1009082. PubMed ID: 33017388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of the mdg1 lineage of the Ty3/gypsy group of LTR retrotransposons in Anopheles gambiae.
    Tubío JM; Costas JC; Naveira HF
    Gene; 2004 Apr; 330():123-31. PubMed ID: 15087131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolving fine-grained dynamics of retrotransposons: comparative analysis of inferential methods and genomic resources.
    Choudhury RR; Neuhaus JM; Parisod C
    Plant J; 2017 Jun; 90(5):979-993. PubMed ID: 28244250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical evolution and horizontal transfer of CR1 non-LTR retrotransposons and Tc1/mariner DNA transposons in Lepidoptera species.
    Sormacheva I; Smyshlyaev G; Mayorov V; Blinov A; Novikov A; Novikova O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Dec; 29(12):3685-702. PubMed ID: 22826456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of transposable elements provides insights into genome evolution in the genus Camelus.
    Ibrahim MA; Al-Shomrani BM; Simenc M; Alharbi SN; Alqahtani FH; Al-Fageeh MB; Manee MM
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):842. PubMed ID: 34800971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Lerat E; Rizzon C; Biémont C
    Genome Res; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1889-96. PubMed ID: 12869581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of two partner LINE/SINE families and a full-length chromodomain-containing Ty3/Gypsy LTR element in the first reptilian genome of Anolis carolinensis.
    Piskurek O; Nishihara H; Okada N
    Gene; 2009 Jul; 441(1-2):111-8. PubMed ID: 19118606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple lineages of the non-LTR retrotransposon Rex1 with varying success in invading fish genomes.
    Volff JN; Körting C; Schartl M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Nov; 17(11):1673-84. PubMed ID: 11070055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in six Citrus species.
    Liu Y; Tahir Ul Qamar M; Feng JW; Ding Y; Wang S; Wu G; Ke L; Xu Q; Chen LL
    BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 30987586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.