These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23909925)

  • 41. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis: state of the art.
    Zhao W; Langfelder P; Fuller T; Dong J; Li A; Hovarth S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):281-300. PubMed ID: 20309759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An enhanced quantile approach for assessing differential gene expressions.
    Wang H; He X
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 18325069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Bayesian extension of the hypergeometric test for functional enrichment analysis.
    Cao J; Zhang S
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 24320951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A semiparametric Bayesian approach for estimating the gene expression distribution.
    Zou F; Huang H; Ibrahim JG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 20309758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mixture models with multiple levels, with application to the analysis of multifactor gene expression data.
    Jörnsten R; Keleş S
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):540-54. PubMed ID: 18256042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Empirical Bayes models for multiple probe type microarrays at the probe level.
    Astrand M; Mostad P; Rudemo M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():156. PubMed ID: 18366694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Discovery of error-tolerant biclusters from noisy gene expression data.
    Gupta R; Rao N; Kumar V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Nov; 12 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1. PubMed ID: 22168285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bayesian ranking and selection methods using hierarchical mixture models in microarray studies.
    Noma H; Matsui S; Omori T; Sato T
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 19946026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bayesian robust inference for differential gene expression in microarrays with multiple samples.
    Gottardo R; Raftery AE; Yeung KY; Bumgarner RE
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 16542223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nonparametric inference for local extrema with application to oligonucleotide microarray data in yeast genome.
    Song PX; Gao X; Liu R; Le W
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):545-54. PubMed ID: 16918919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bayesian neural networks for bivariate binary data: an application to prostate cancer study.
    Chakraborty S; Ghosh M; Maiti T; Tewari A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3645-62. PubMed ID: 16138362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Bayesian approach for decision making on the identification of genes with different expression levels: an application to Escherichia coli bacterium data.
    Saraiva EF; Louzada F; Milan LA; Meira S; Cobre J
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():953086. PubMed ID: 22474543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Generalized singular value decomposition for comparative analysis of genome-scale expression data sets of two different organisms.
    Alter O; Brown PO; Botstein D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(6):3351-6. PubMed ID: 12631705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Statistical significance of variables driving systematic variation in high-dimensional data.
    Chung NC; Storey JD
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 25336500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A nonparametric scoring algorithm for identifying informative genes from microarray data.
    Park PJ; Pagano M; Bonetti M
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():52-63. PubMed ID: 11262969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identifying differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis via Bayesian model-based clustering.
    Jung YY; Oh MS; Shin DW; Kang SH; Oh HS
    Biom J; 2006 Jun; 48(3):435-50. PubMed ID: 16845907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.