These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910197)
1. Survival of bonded lingual retainers with chemical or photo polymerization over a 2-year period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Pandis N; Fleming PS; Kloukos D; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 23910197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period. Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 25432250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Egli F; Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 28024770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative assessment of failures and periodontal health between 2 mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial. Węgrodzka E; Kornatowska K; Pandis N; Fudalej PS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):494-502.e1. PubMed ID: 34384638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure Rates of Orthodontic Fixed Lingual Retainers bonded with Two Flowable Light-cured Adhesives: A Comparative Prospective Clinical Trial. Talic NF J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 27659078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bisphenol A release from orthodontic adhesives and its correlation with the degree of conversion. Purushothaman D; Kailasam V; Chitharanjan AB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25533069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of flexible, braided, bonded stainless steel lingual retainers: a historic cohort study. Lie Sam Foek DJ; Ozcan M; Verkerke GJ; Sandham A; Dijkstra PU Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18222927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lingual retainers bonded without liquid resin: a 5-year follow-up study. Tang AT; Forsberg CM; Andlin-Sobocki A; Ekstrand J; Hägg U Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 23273365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention. Rose E; Frucht S; Jonas IE Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fast halogen and plasma arc curing lights on the surface hardness of orthodontic adhesives for lingual retainers. Uşümez S; Büyükyilmaz T; Karaman AI Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jun; 123(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 12806343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers. Lee KD; Mills CM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 19361737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration. Kamath U; Sheth H; Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 5-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Cornelis MA; Egli F; Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cattaneo PM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):152-161.e1. PubMed ID: 35551840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentinfor compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites. Bolhuis PB; de Gee AJ; Kleverlaan CJ; El Zohairy AA; Feilzer AJ Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 16443265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A; Kolokithas G; Athanasiou AE J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 30(2):139-47; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 12835430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations. Pallesen U; van Dijken JW Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) curing modes on resin/dentin bond strength. Fahmy N; Naguib H; Guindy JE J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 19682222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under bonded lingual retainers. Baysal A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Usumez S Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1084-8. PubMed ID: 18947287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Light-emitting diode vs halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 15-month clinical study of bond failures. Krishnaswamy NR; Sunitha C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 17920506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]