1034 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910205)
1. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
Chen M; Li ZM; Liu X; Cai B; Wang DW; Feng ZC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
Koyama I; Iino S; Abe Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Miyawaki S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 21059875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents.
Sa'aed NL; Park CO; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim Y; Kook YA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25191840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes.
Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.
Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.
Deguchi T; Murakami T; Kuroda S; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 18456138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth.
Oh YH; Park HS; Kwon TG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 21457858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
