1035 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910205)
21. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Arman-Ozcirpici A; Veziroglu F
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 19289539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the intrusive effects of miniscrews and utility arches.
Polat-Özsoy Ö; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Veziroğlu F; Çetinşahin A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 21457864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The short-term skeleto-dental effects of a new spring for the intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth in open bite patients.
Foot R; Dalci O; Gonzales C; Tarraf NE; Darendeliler MA
Prog Orthod; 2014 Sep; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 25329709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion.
Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.
Aslan BI; Kucukkaraca E; Turkoz C; Dincer M
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23772682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Occlusal plane change after intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth by microimplants to avoid maxillary surgery with skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery.
Park HS; Kim JY; Kwon TG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 21055605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
Hourfar J; Ludwig B; Kanavakis G
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dento-skeletal effects of the Pendulum Hygienic Distalizer.
Ba-Yazed AH; Hafez AM; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 25745706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
Hayashida H; Ioi H; Nakata S; Takahashi I; Counts AL
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20966067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term mandibular skeletal and dental effects of standard edgewise treatment.
Bayirli B; Vaden JL; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 24182584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with multiloop edgewise arch wire and modified Class III elastics by maxillary mini-implant anchorage.
He S; Gao J; Wamalwa P; Wang Y; Zou S; Chen S
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):630-40. PubMed ID: 23311602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
