1033 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910205)
41. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint.
Scheffler NR; Proffit WR; Phillips C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 25439210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Combined use of miniscrews and continuous arch for intrusive root movement of incisors in Class II division 2 with gummy smile.
Kim SJ; Kim JW; Choi TH; Lee KJ
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 24512532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Distalization of the maxillary and mandibular dentitions with miniscrew anchorage in a patient with moderate Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Chen G; Teng F; Xu TM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 26926028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols.
Yılmaz A; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Erken S; Polat-Özsoy Ö
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 25564504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Bondemark L; Karlsson I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effective approach for improving a gummy smile : Upward movement of the maxillary occlusal plane using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch.
Miyazawa K; Tamada Y; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Sato T; Okamoto K; Saito N; Goto S
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(3):167-180. PubMed ID: 36006416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Molar Intrusion in Open-bite Adults Using Zygomatic Miniplates.
Marzouk ES; Abdallah EM; El-Kenany WA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):47-54. PubMed ID: 26349291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients.
Lineberger MW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Herberger T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 22748991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews.
Chen G; Chen S; Zhang XY; Jiang RP; Liu Y; Shi FH; Xu TM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 21457456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.
Zablocki HL; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):852-60. PubMed ID: 18538249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular dentition distalization.
Jing Y; Han X; Guo Y; Li J; Bai D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):877-87. PubMed ID: 23726338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
