216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910210)
1. Bidimensional dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis for treatment efficiency.
Uribe F; Agarwal S; Janakiraman N; Shafer D; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 23910210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transport dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis-assisted rapid orthodontic canine retraction.
Kharkar VR; Kotrashetti SM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 20097101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increasing orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment efficiency with a modified surgery-first approach.
Uribe F; Agarwal S; Shafer D; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):838-48. PubMed ID: 26522045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular body lengthening by distraction osteogenesis for correction of skeletal class II problems with an impacted premolar.
Takahashi I; Terao F; Suzuki M; Kawamura H; Takano-Yamamoto T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2893-902. PubMed ID: 20828909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with severe crowding by a specially designed rapid maxillary expander.
Wang H; Feng J; Lu P; Shen G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):242-51. PubMed ID: 25636559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporary anchorage and segmental distraction osteogenesis devices: surgical and orthodontic rationales.
Rungcharassaeng K; Kan JY; Caruso JM; Herford A
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(1):43-50; quiz 51, 35. PubMed ID: 19456056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior segmental distraction of the hypoplastic maxilla by a tooth borne device: a study on the movement of the segment.
Okcu KM; Sencimen M; Karacay S; Bengi AO; Ors F; Dogan N; Gokce HS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(8):817-22. PubMed ID: 19442488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-year follow-up of a patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with distraction osteogenesis, temporary anchorage devices, and orthodontics.
Amm EW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):115-28. PubMed ID: 22748997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CAD-CAM-fabricated mini-implant insertion guides for the delivery of a distalization appliance in a single appointment.
Wilmes B; Vasudavan S; Drescher D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):148-156. PubMed ID: 31256828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid palatal expander: an anchor unit for second molar distalization in Angle Class II treatment.
Kolokitha OE; Papadopoulou AK
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 20209182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Symphyseal distraction: a simplified procedure].
Savoldelli C; Lesne V; Ciszek E; Lebeau J; Bettega G
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010; 111(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 21109275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentoalveolar transport osteodistraction and canine distalization.
Kisnisci RS; Iseri H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):763-70. PubMed ID: 21353933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined maxillary and mandibular midline and mandibular ramus distraction osteogenesis for treatment of a Class II patient with implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Takahashi I; Kawamura H; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 20197182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability, tipping and relapse of bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion; a prospective randomized patient trial.
Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ; Hop WC; van der Wal KG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 19278832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of a unilateral Class II crossbite malocclusion with traumatic loss of a maxillary central incisor and a lateral incisor.
Sabri R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):759-70. PubMed ID: 17169739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary constriction treated by a new palatal distractor device: surgical and occlusal evaluations of 10 patients.
Cortese A; Savastano M; Savastano G; Papa F; Howard CM; Claudio PP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 20186084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of interdental distraction osteogenesis for orthodontic tooth alignment and correction of maxillary hypoplasia: a case report.
Tong AC; Yan BS; Chan TC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 41(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 12804544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral and dental restoration of wide alveolar cleft using distraction osteogenesis and temporary anchorage devices.
Rachmiel A; Emodi O; Gutmacher Z; Blumenfeld I; Aizenbud D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):728-34. PubMed ID: 23402733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
