677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910366)
1. Bioactive polymeric-ceramic hybrid 3D scaffold for application in bone tissue regeneration.
Torres AL; Gaspar VM; Serra IR; Diogo GS; Fradique R; Silva AP; Correia IJ
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Oct; 33(7):4460-9. PubMed ID: 23910366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro assessment of three-dimensionally plotted nagelschmidtite bioceramic scaffolds with varied macropore morphologies.
Xu M; Zhai D; Chang J; Wu C
Acta Biomater; 2014 Jan; 10(1):463-76. PubMed ID: 24071000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High biocompatibility and improved osteogenic potential of novel Ca-P/titania composite scaffolds designed for regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects.
Cunha C; Sprio S; Panseri S; Dapporto M; Marcacci M; Tampieri A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Jun; 101(6):1612-9. PubMed ID: 23172612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fabrication and characterization of sol-gel derived 45S5 Bioglass®-ceramic scaffolds.
Chen QZ; Thouas GA
Acta Biomater; 2011 Oct; 7(10):3616-26. PubMed ID: 21689791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fabrication of 3D porous SF/β-TCP hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue reconstruction.
Park HJ; Min KD; Lee MC; Kim SH; Lee OJ; Ju HW; Moon BM; Lee JM; Park YR; Kim DW; Jeong JY; Park CH
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Jul; 104(7):1779-87. PubMed ID: 26999521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel porous bioceramics scaffold by accumulating hydroxyapatite spherules for large bone tissue engineering in vivo. I. Preparation and characterization of scaffold.
Peng Q; Jiang F; Huang P; Zhou S; Weng J; Bao C; Zhang C; Yu H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jun; 93(3):920-9. PubMed ID: 19708076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity through hydroxyapatite coating of silk-based tissue-engineered ligament scaffold.
He P; Sahoo S; Ng KS; Chen K; Toh SL; Goh JC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Feb; 101(2):555-66. PubMed ID: 22949167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving mechanical and biological properties of macroporous HA scaffolds through composite coatings.
Zhao J; Lu X; Duan K; Guo LY; Zhou SB; Weng J
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2009 Nov; 74(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 19679453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of porous chitosan-gelatin/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for hard tissue-engineering applications.
Isikli C; Hasirci V; Hasirci N
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2012 Feb; 6(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 21351375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomimetic composite coating on rapid prototyped scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Arafat MT; Lam CX; Ekaputra AK; Wong SY; Li X; Gibson I
Acta Biomater; 2011 Feb; 7(2):809-20. PubMed ID: 20849985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/calcium phosphate ceramics composites--novel cell scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application.
Przekora A; Palka K; Ginalska G
J Biotechnol; 2014 Jul; 182-183():46-53. PubMed ID: 24815684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel bioceramic-reinforced hydrogel for alveolar bone regeneration.
Iviglia G; Cassinelli C; Torre E; Baino F; Morra M; Vitale-Brovarone C
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():97-109. PubMed ID: 27521494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of porous beta-TCP scaffolds with rhBMP-2 chitosan carrier film for bone tissue application.
Abarrategi A; Moreno-Vicente C; Ramos V; Aranaz I; Sanz Casado JV; López-Lacomba JL
Tissue Eng Part A; 2008 Aug; 14(8):1305-19. PubMed ID: 18491953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manufacture of β-TCP/alginate scaffolds through a Fab@home model for application in bone tissue engineering.
Diogo GS; Gaspar VM; Serra IR; Fradique R; Correia IJ
Biofabrication; 2014 Jun; 6(2):025001. PubMed ID: 24657988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.
Kim JA; Lim J; Naren R; Yun HS; Park EK
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():155-67. PubMed ID: 27554019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an osteoconductive PCL-PDIPF-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Fernandez JM; Molinuevo MS; Cortizo MS; Cortizo AM
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2011 Jun; 5(6):e126-35. PubMed ID: 21312338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The enhancement of bone regeneration by a combination of osteoconductivity and osteostimulation using β-CaSiO3/β-Ca3(PO4)2 composite bioceramics.
Wang C; Xue Y; Lin K; Lu J; Chang J; Sun J
Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):350-60. PubMed ID: 21925627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcite as a bone substitute. Comparison with hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate with regard to the osteoblastic activity.
Monchau F; Hivart P; Genestie B; Chai F; Descamps M; Hildebrand HF
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Jan; 33(1):490-8. PubMed ID: 25428100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid-prototyped PLGA/β-TCP/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds in a rabbit femoral defect model.
Kim J; McBride S; Tellis B; Alvarez-Urena P; Song YH; Dean DD; Sylvia VL; Elgendy H; Ong J; Hollinger JO
Biofabrication; 2012 Jun; 4(2):025003. PubMed ID: 22427485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites.
Roohani-Esfahani SI; Nouri-Khorasani S; Lu Z; Appleyard R; Zreiqat H
Biomaterials; 2010 Jul; 31(21):5498-509. PubMed ID: 20398935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
