BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910426)

  • 41. Perception and practice of malaria prophylaxis in pregnancy among primary health care providers in Ibadan, Nigeria.
    Fawole AO; Onyeaso NC
    West Afr J Med; 2008 Apr; 27(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 19025022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Politics, policies, pronatalism, and practice: availability and accessibility of abortion and reproductive health services in Turkey.
    MacFarlane KA; O'Neil ML; Tekdemir D; Çetin E; Bilgen B; Foster AM
    Reprod Health Matters; 2016 Nov; 24(48):62-70. PubMed ID: 28024680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reproductive health services for adolescents under the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
    Gold RB; Sonfield A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2001; 33(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 11330855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Knowledge and perception of the Nigerian Abortion Law by abortion seekers in south-eastern Nigeria.
    Adinma ED; Adinma JI; Ugboaja J; Iwuoha C; Akiode A; Oji E; Okoh M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Nov; 31(8):763-6. PubMed ID: 22085072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs.
    Berry SR; Bell CM; Ubel PA; Evans WK; Nadler E; Strevel EL; Neumann PJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4149-53. PubMed ID: 20697077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of state-level restrictions on abortion.
    Meier KJ; Haider-Markel DP; Stanislawski AJ; McFarlane DR
    Demography; 1996 Aug; 33(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 8875064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Abortion restrictions may undermine welfare reform.
    Popul Today; 1999 Feb; 27(2):3. PubMed ID: 12348920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Knowledge of abortion law and provision of abortion services amongst tertiary students in Far North Queensland.
    Phillips T; Eltherington J; de Costa C; Woods C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Jun; 52(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 22413818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Knowledge of Abortion Laws and Services Among Low-Income Women in Three United States Cities.
    Lara D; Holt K; Peña M; Grossman D
    J Immigr Minor Health; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1811-8. PubMed ID: 25488893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Informed or Misinformed Consent? Abortion Policy in the United States.
    Daniels CR; Ferguson J; Howard G; Roberti A
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Apr; 41(2):181-209. PubMed ID: 26732319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion -- impact on public health.
    Malkasian GD
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mainstreaming contraceptive services in managed care--five states' experiences.
    Gold RB; Darroch JE; Frost JJ
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(5):204-11. PubMed ID: 9782042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neoliberal reforms and privatisation of reproductive health services in post-socialist Poland.
    Mishtal J
    Reprod Health Matters; 2010 Nov; 18(36):56-66. PubMed ID: 21111351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996.
    Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):263-70, 287. PubMed ID: 9859016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Abortion and Islam: policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa.
    Hessini L
    Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):75-84. PubMed ID: 17512379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quantifying the impact of targeted regulation of abortion provider laws on US abortion rates: a multi-state assessment.
    Austin N; Harper S
    Contraception; 2019 Nov; 100(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 31202816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception.
    Jones RK; Boonstra H
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Righting the mismatch between law, policy and the sexual and reproductive health needs of young people in the Asia-Pacific Region.
    Godwin J; Szabo G; Sass J; Sauvarin J
    Reprod Health Matters; 2014 Nov; 22(44):137-47. PubMed ID: 25555771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Abortion-seeking minors' views on the Illinois parental notification law: a qualitative study.
    Kavanagh EK; Hasselbacher LA; Betham B; Tristan S; Gilliam ML
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2012 Sep; 44(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 22958660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.