These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910426)

  • 61. Assessments of the importance of provider characteristics for abortion care: data from women in Rajasthan, India.
    Elul B
    Health Care Women Int; 2011 Jan; 32(1):72-95. PubMed ID: 21154075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Roles and strategies of state organizations related to school-based physical education and physical activity policies.
    Cradock AL; Barrett JL; Carnoske C; Chriqui JF; Evenson KR; Gustat J; Healy IB; Heinrich KM; Lemon SC; Tompkins NO; Reed HL; Zieff SG
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(3 Suppl 1):S34-40. PubMed ID: 23529053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Making it legal: abortion providers' knowledge and use of abortion law in New South Wales and Queensland.
    de Costa C; Douglas H; Black K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 53(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23347292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Adolescents' knowledge of and attitudes toward Minnesota laws concerning adolescent medical care.
    Loertscher L; Simmons PS
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 19(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 16731414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Factors associated with the timing of abortions.
    Gonzalez F; Quast T; Venanzi A
    Health Econ; 2020 Feb; 29(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 31793124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States.
    Pabayo R; Ehntholt A; Cook DM; Reynolds M; Muennig P; Liu SY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32466506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws.
    Austin N; Harper S
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Oct; 54(5):1084-1089. PubMed ID: 31206632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Impact of State-Level Reproductive Health Legislation on Access to and Use of Reproductive Health Services and Reproductive Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review in the Affordable Care Act Era.
    Bossick AS; Brown J; Hanna A; Parrish C; Williams EC; Katon JG
    Womens Health Issues; 2021; 31(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 33303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Provision of abortion and other reproductive health services among former Midwest Access Project trainees.
    Stulberg DB; Monast K; Dahlquist IH; Palmer K
    Contraception; 2018 Apr; 97(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 29337041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Association of Availability of State Medicaid Coverage for Abortion With Abortion Access in the United States.
    McDonnell J; Jarlenski M; Borrero S; Vinekar K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 36075060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.
    Mercier RJ; Buchbinder M; Bryant A
    Crit Public Health; 2016; 26(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 27570376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The importance of access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including abortion: a statement from women's health professional organizations.
    Espey E; Dennis A; Landy U
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 30267653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Responding to Evolving Abortion Regulations - The Critical Role of Primary Care.
    Beaman J; Schillinger D
    N Engl J Med; 2019 May; 380(18):e30. PubMed ID: 30995367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A 21st-Century Public Health Approach to Abortion.
    Roberts SCM; Fuentes L; Berglas NF; Dennis AJ
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Dec; 107(12):1878-1882. PubMed ID: 29048963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Genetic Counselors' Perception of the Effect on Practice of Laws Restricting Abortion.
    Cooney C; Hercher L; Bajaj K
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Oct; 26(5):1059-1069. PubMed ID: 28349288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Does state-level context matter for individuals' knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the 'red states v. blue states' hypothesis.
    Bessett D; Gerdts C; Littman LL; Kavanaugh ML; Norris A
    Cult Health Sex; 2015; 17(6):733-46. PubMed ID: 25622191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Using a simulated patient to assess referral for abortion services in the USA.
    Dodge LE; Haider S; Hacker MR
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2012 Oct; 38(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 22262620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994-2022.
    Roth LM; Lee JH
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):511-543. PubMed ID: 36693181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Denial of Safe Abortion to Survivors of Rape in India.
    Bhate-Deosthali P; Rege S
    Health Hum Rights; 2019 Dec; 21(2):189-198. PubMed ID: 31885448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.