128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910447)
1. Experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse treatment planning system for effects on dose distribution of the hip prostheses.
Catlı S; Tanır G
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 23910447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
Çatli S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the accuracy of various dose calculation algorithms of a commercial treatment planning system in the presence of hip prosthesis and comparison with Monte Carlo.
Mohammadi K; Hassani M; Ghorbani M; Farhood B; Knaup C
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):501-509. PubMed ID: 28862217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.
Mesbahi A; Nejad FS
Radiat Med; 2007 Dec; 25(10):529-35. PubMed ID: 18085404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 12804709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an analytic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for high-density inhomogeneities.
Lloyd SA; Ansbacher W
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011707. PubMed ID: 23298077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. VMAT Optimization and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Metallic Hip Prostheses.
Parenica HM; Mavroidis P; Jones W; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819892255. PubMed ID: 31789113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the effect of dental implant materials with different densities on radiotherapy dose distribution using Monte-Carlo simulation and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Akyol O; Dirican B; Toklu T; Eren H; Olgar T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180267. PubMed ID: 30663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose calculation accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm for CyberKnife compared with other commercially available dose calculation algorithms.
Sharma S; Ott J; Williams J; Dickow D
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 21144731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retinoblastoma external beam photon irradiation with a special 'D'-shaped collimator: a comparison between measurements, Monte Carlo simulation and a treatment planning system calculation.
Brualla L; Mayorga PA; Flühs A; Lallena AM; Sempau J; Sauerwein W
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7741-51. PubMed ID: 23123926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GATE as a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo platform for the evaluation of proton pencil beam scanning treatment plans.
Grevillot L; Bertrand D; Dessy F; Freud N; Sarrut D
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4223-44. PubMed ID: 22684098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of HDR near source dosimetry using a treatment planning system, Monte Carlo simulation, and radiochromic film.
Amoush A; Luckstead M; Lamba M; Elson H; Kassing W
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 23246195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
