These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910548)

  • 41. Dairy farmer use of price risk management tools.
    Wolf CA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4176-83. PubMed ID: 22720973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Invited review: Changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare.
    Barkema HW; von Keyserlingk MA; Kastelic JP; Lam TJ; Luby C; Roy JP; LeBlanc SJ; Keefe GP; Kelton DF
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7426-45. PubMed ID: 26342982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
    Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Associations between age at first calving, rearing average daily weight gain, herd milk yield and dairy herd production, reproduction, and profitability.
    Krpálková L; Cabrera VE; Kvapilík J; Burdych J; Crump P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6573-82. PubMed ID: 25064657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A biological and economic comparison of 2 pasture-based production systems on a wetland drumlin soil in the northern region of Ireland.
    Patton D; Shalloo L; Pierce KM; Horan B
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):484-95. PubMed ID: 22192229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of sensor systems for cow management on milk production, somatic cell count, and reproduction.
    Steeneveld W; Vernooij JC; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):3896-905. PubMed ID: 25841965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy.
    Guerci M; Bava L; Zucali M; Sandrucci A; Penati C; Tamburini A
    J Dairy Res; 2013 Aug; 80(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 23806128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The farm cost of decreasing antimicrobial use in dairy production.
    Lhermie G; Tauer LW; Gröhn YT
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194832. PubMed ID: 29566103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stochastic bio-economic modeling of mastitis in Ethiopian dairy farms.
    Getaneh AM; Mekonnen SA; Hogeveen H
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():94-103. PubMed ID: 28237241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Milk marketing policy options for the dairy industry in New England.
    Doyon M; Criner G; Bragg LA
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Mar; 91(3):1229-35. PubMed ID: 18292281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An empirical analysis of the cost of rearing dairy heifers from birth to first calving and the time taken to repay these costs.
    Boulton AC; Rushton J; Wathes DC
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 28173887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management.
    Steeneveld W; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jan; 98(1):709-17. PubMed ID: 25465556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Long-term trends of nitrogen and phosphorus mass balances on New York State dairy farms.
    Cela S; Ketterings QM; Czymmek K; Soberon M; Rasmussen C
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Oct; 98(10):7052-70. PubMed ID: 26254530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Milking efficiency of swingover herringbone parlours in pasture-based dairy systems.
    Edwards JP; O'Brien B; Lopez-Villalobos N; Jago JG
    J Dairy Res; 2013 Nov; 80(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 24000951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparing technical efficiency of farms with an automatic milking system and a conventional milking system.
    Steeneveld W; Tauer LW; Hogeveen H; Oude Lansink AG
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Dec; 95(12):7391-8. PubMed ID: 23021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An economic evaluation of recombinant bovine somatotropin approval in Japan.
    Kinoshita J; Suzuki N; Kaiser HM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 May; 87(5):1565-77. PubMed ID: 15291007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Organic dairy production systems in Pennsylvania: a case study evaluation.
    Rotz CA; Kamphuis GH; Karsten HD; Weaver RD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3961-79. PubMed ID: 17639008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dairy cow breed interacts with stocking rate in temperate pasture-based dairy production systems.
    Spaans OK; Macdonald KA; Lancaster JAS; Bryant AM; Roche JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4690-4702. PubMed ID: 29501332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system.
    Bacenetti J; Bava L; Zucali M; Lovarelli D; Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Fiala M
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():450-459. PubMed ID: 26383852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
    O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.