128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910733)
1. Rational care or rationing care? The case of cervical screening across the United Kingdom.
Flynn H; Lewis P
Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 112(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 23910733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened.
Herbert A; Holdsworth G; Kubba AA
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jan; 34(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 18201402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An examination of the role of opportunistic smear taking in the NHS cervical screening programme using data from the CSEU cervical screening cohort study.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Swerdlow AJ
BJOG; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 17803716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervix cancer screening in Croatia within the European Cervical Cancer Prevention Week.
Skopljanac-Macina L; Mahovlić V; Ovanin-Rakić A; Barisić A; Rajhvajn S; Juric D; Babić D; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Jun; 34(2):613-7. PubMed ID: 20698138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anglian Genitourinary Medicine Audit Group -- cervical cytology screening in HIV-positive women.
Harry TC
Int J STD AIDS; 2009 Jan; 20(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 19103897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical screening in England and Wales: an update.
Mohan S; Ind T
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 16(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 15534446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why women still die from cervical cancer.
Masood S
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 9379163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer in women aged less than 25: East Kent experience.
Nair MS; Bhandari HM; Nordin AJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):706-8. PubMed ID: 17999298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why lesbians should be encouraged to have regular cervical screening.
Henderson HJ
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2009 Jan; 35(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19126320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of policy and screening on cervical cancer in England.
Bryant E
Br J Nurs; 2012 Feb 23-Mar 7; 21(4):S4, S6-10. PubMed ID: 22470899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical screening in 20-24-year olds.
Rieck GC; Tristram A; Hauke A; Fielder H; Fiander AN
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):64-71; discussion 62-3. PubMed ID: 16792827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human papillomavirus vaccination in adolescence.
Russell M; Raheja V; Jaiyesimi R
Perspect Public Health; 2013 Nov; 133(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 24006173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening: meeting the needs of minority ethnic women.
Luke K
Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep; 29():S47-50. PubMed ID: 8782799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated.
Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2000 Dec; 11(6):471-9. PubMed ID: 11194078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
