134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23910930)
1. How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study.
Smith SG; Vart G; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Baker HJ; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):703-14. PubMed ID: 23910930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet.
Smith SG; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 24007765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acceptability of a standalone written leaflet for the National Health Service for England Targeted Lung Health Check Programme: A concurrent, think-aloud study.
Jallow M; Black G; van Os S; Baldwin DR; Brain KE; Donnelly M; Janes SM; Kurtidu C; McCutchan G; Robb KA; Ruparel M; Quaife SL
Health Expect; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1776-1788. PubMed ID: 35475542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey.
Kobayashi LC; Waller J; von Wagner C; Wardle J
BMC Public Health; 2016 Jul; 16():659. PubMed ID: 27473593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.
Smith SG; Wardle J; Atkin W; Raine R; McGregor LM; Vart G; Morris S; Duffy SW; Moss S; Hackshaw A; Halloran S; Kralj-Hans I; Howe R; Snowball J; Handley G; Logan RF; Rainbow S; Smith S; Thomas M; Counsell N; von Wagner C
BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):543. PubMed ID: 28806955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial.
Smith SG; Raine R; Obichere A; Wolf MS; Wardle J; von Wagner C
J Behav Med; 2015 Apr; 38(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 25253443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Do Women Interpret the NHS Information Leaflet about Cervical Cancer Screening?
Okan Y; Petrova D; Smith SG; Lesic V; Bruine de Bruin W
Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):738-754. PubMed ID: 31556840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.
Fransen MP; Dekker E; Timmermans DRM; Uiters E; Essink-Bot ML
Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Feb; 100(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 27613567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "It is just another test they want to do": Patient and caregiver understanding of the colonoscopy procedure.
King-Marshall EC; Mueller N; Dailey A; Barnett TE; George TJ; Sultan S; Curbow B
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Apr; 99(4):651-658. PubMed ID: 26597383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.
Smith SK; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; Barratt A; McCaffery KJ
Health Expect; 2008 Jun; 11(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 18494957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme.
Kerrison RS; McGregor LM; Marshall S; Isitt J; Counsell N; Rees CJ; von Wagner C
Endoscopy; 2017 Jan; 49(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27997965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].
Seidel G; Münch I; Dreier M; Borutta B; Walter U; Dierks ML
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Mar; 57(3):366-79. PubMed ID: 24562713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: an experimental study.
Meppelink CS; van Weert JC; Haven CJ; Smit EG
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e11. PubMed ID: 25586711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Two Self-referral Reminders and a Theory-Based Leaflet to Increase the Uptake of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the English Bowel Scope Screening Program: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in London.
Kerrison RS; McGregor LM; Counsell N; Marshall S; Prentice A; Isitt J; Rees CJ; von Wagner C
Ann Behav Med; 2018 Oct; 52(11):941-951. PubMed ID: 30346495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invitees do not adequately act on alarm symptoms in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical tests.
de Klerk CM; Woudstra AJ; Fransen MP; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jan; 31(1):141-142. PubMed ID: 30507642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Questionnaire Validation of Colorectal Cancer Literacy Scale among Thai People in Northeastern Thailand.
Kawthaisong C; Promthet S; Kamsa-Ard S; Duangsong R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):645-651. PubMed ID: 30806072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design.
Smith F; Carlsson E; Kokkinakis D; Forsberg M; Kodeda K; Sawatzky R; Friberg F; Öhlén J
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Feb; 94(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 24290242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health literacy levels and views about being invited to a colorectal cancer screening program.
Wangmar J; Jervaeus A; Fritzell K; Wångdahl J; Hultcrantz R; Wengström Y
Acta Oncol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):743-749. PubMed ID: 29308944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
