These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23911162)

  • 1. Evaluation of the performance of a novel system for continuous glucose monitoring.
    Zschornack E; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Klötzer HM; Obermaier K; Schoemaker M; Strasser M; Frisch G; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 23911162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
    Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of three continuous glucose monitoring systems: comparison of six sensors per subject in parallel.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 23911165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
    Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
    Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
    Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Kamecke U; Haug C; Baumgartner B; Weitgasser R
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 13(5):890-898. PubMed ID: 30730229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space.
    Heinemann L; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Hinzmann R; Kassab A; Freckmann G; Reiterer F; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):135-150. PubMed ID: 31216870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time Delay of CGM Sensors: Relevance, Causes, and Countermeasures.
    Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Kirchsteiger H; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 9(5):1006-15. PubMed ID: 26243773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisite Study of an Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor Over 90 Days in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
    Dehennis A; Mortellaro MA; Ioacara S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(5):951-6. PubMed ID: 26224762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.
    Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adult Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vasopressor Therapy.
    Friman O; Soltani N; Lind M; Zetterqvist P; Balintescu A; Perner A; Oldner A; Rooyackers O; Mårtensson J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2024 Oct; 26(10):763-772. PubMed ID: 38758211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
    Sharifi A; Varsavsky A; Ulloa J; Horsburgh JC; McAuley SA; Krishnamurthy B; Jenkins AJ; Colman PG; Ward GM; MacIsaac RJ; Shah R; O'Neal DN
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 May; 10(3):669-78. PubMed ID: 26499476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the Accuracy and Performance of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Prototype: An In-Silico Study Using the UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator.
    Breton MD; Hinzmann R; Campos-Nañez E; Riddle S; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):545-552. PubMed ID: 28745098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation of Mean Absolute Relative Differences of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Throughout the Day.
    Pleus S; Stuhr A; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 May; 16(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 33615834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Chang AR; Levy CJ; Lam D; Denham DS; Atiee G; Bode BW; Walters SJ; Kelley L; Bailey TS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 29381090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.