381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23911165)
1. Performance evaluation of three continuous glucose monitoring systems: comparison of six sensors per subject in parallel.
Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 23911165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the performance of a novel system for continuous glucose monitoring.
Zschornack E; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Klötzer HM; Obermaier K; Schoemaker M; Strasser M; Frisch G; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 23911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors.
Damiano ER; El-Khatib FH; Zheng H; Nathan DM; Russell SJ
Diabetes Care; 2013 Feb; 36(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 23275350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with TRUstart algorithm, a 1-hour warm-up time.
Geoffrey M; Brazg R; Richard W
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 21303631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
Laffel L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.
Garg SK; Smith J; Beatson C; Lopez-Baca B; Voelmle M; Gottlieb PA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Feb; 11(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 19243265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions.
Boscari F; Galasso S; Facchinetti A; Marescotti MC; Vallone V; Amato AML; Avogaro A; Bruttomesso D
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Feb; 28(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29258716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (guardian REAL-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes.
Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Andelin M; Hirsch IB; Attvall S; Pivodic A; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; Lind M
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Nov; 16(11):759-67. PubMed ID: 25233297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation of Mean Absolute Relative Differences of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Throughout the Day.
Pleus S; Stuhr A; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 May; 16(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 33615834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance comparison of the medtronic sof-sensor and enlite glucose sensors in inpatient studies of individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Calhoun P; Lum J; Beck RW; Kollman C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Sep; 15(9):758-61. PubMed ID: 23725474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model of glucose sensor error components: identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices.
Facchinetti A; Del Favero S; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Dec; 53(12):1259-69. PubMed ID: 25416850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.
Bailey T; Zisser H; Chang A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Dec; 11(12):749-55. PubMed ID: 20001675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
Freckmann G; Link M; Kamecke U; Haug C; Baumgartner B; Weitgasser R
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 13(5):890-898. PubMed ID: 30730229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Point Accuracy Between Two Widely Used Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.
Hanson K; Kipnes M; Tran H
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 38189290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
