630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23911637)
1. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann KT; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 30007500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
Andolfi C; Rodríguez VM; Galansky L; Gundeti MS
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 34247895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.
Lee RS; Retik AB; Borer JG; Peters CA
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):683-7; discussion 687. PubMed ID: 16407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants.
Avery DI; Herbst KW; Lendvay TS; Noh PH; Dangle P; Gundeti MS; Steele MC; Corbett ST; Peters CA; Kim C
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):139.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26052000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Robotic pyeloplasty: first experiences].
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo G
Cir Pediatr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 24482904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
Patel V
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
Xu W; Li H; Ji Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Xiao H; Liu G
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
