156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23911765)
21. Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach.
Bohn BA; Kershner JL
J Environ Manage; 2002 Apr; 64(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12141156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Integrated water resources management in the Ruhr River Basin, Germany.
Bode H; Evers P; Albrecht DR
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):81-6. PubMed ID: 12793665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Riverine threat indices to assess watershed condition and identify primary management capacity of agriculture natural resource management agencies.
Fore JD; Sowa SP; Galat DL; Annis GM; Diamond DD; Rewa C
Environ Manage; 2014 Mar; 53(3):567-82. PubMed ID: 24390081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physical characterization of a watershed through GIS: a study in the Schmidt stream, Brazil.
Reis DR; Plangg R; Tundisi JG; Quevedo DM
Braz J Biol; 2015 Dec; 75(4 Suppl 2):S16-29. PubMed ID: 26628241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative analysis: storm water pollution policy in California, USA and Victoria, Australia.
Swamikannu X; Radulescu D; Young R; Allison R
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):311-7. PubMed ID: 12793695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The assessment of water use and reuse through reported data: A US case study.
Wiener MJ; Jafvert CT; Nies LF
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():70-77. PubMed ID: 26363391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An ecosystem report on the Panama Canal: monitoring the status of the forest communities and the watershed.
Ibáñez R; Condit R; Angehr G; Aguilar S; García T; Martínez R; Sanjur A; Stallard R; Wright SJ; Rand AS; Heckadon S
Environ Monit Assess; 2002 Nov; 80(1):65-95. PubMed ID: 12437064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic phosphorus mass balance modeling of large watersheds: long-term implications of management strategies.
Cassell EA; Kort RL; Meals DW; Aschmann SG; Dorioz JM; Anderson DP
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(5):153-62. PubMed ID: 11379127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA.
Meals DW; Hopkins RB
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 12079124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An integrated environmental decision support system for water pollution control based on TMDL--A case study in the Beiyun River watershed.
Zhang S; Li Y; Zhang T; Peng Y
J Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 156():31-40. PubMed ID: 25791234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is a clean river fun for all? Recognizing social vulnerability in watershed planning.
Cutts BB; Greenlee AJ; Prochaska NK; Chantrill CV; Contractor AB; Wilhoit JM; Abts N; Hornik K
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196416. PubMed ID: 29715285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is bigger better? Driving factors of POTW performance in New York.
Rahm BG; Morse N; Bowen M; Choi J; Mehta D; Vedachalam S
Water Res; 2018 May; 135():134-143. PubMed ID: 29466717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Land use planning and social equity in North Carolina's compensatory wetland and stream mitigation programs.
BenDor T; Stewart A
Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 21136054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimum positioning of wastewater treatment plants in a river network: A model-based approach to minimize microbial pollution.
Mishra S; Kneis D; Berendonk TU; Aubeneau A
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 691():1310-1319. PubMed ID: 31466210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sustainable development in pollution control and the role of anaerobic treatment.
Lettinga G; Van Lier JB; Van Buuren JC; Zeeman G
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(6):181-8. PubMed ID: 11700658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A watershed-scale assessment of cost-effectiveness of sediment abatement with flow diversion terraces.
Yang Q; Zhao Z; Benoy G; Chow TL; Rees HW; Bourque CP; Meng FR
J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 20048309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of simulation mass balance modeling to estimate phosphorus and bacteria dynamics in watersheds.
Cassell EA; Meals DW; Aschmann SG; Anderson DP; Rosen BH; Kort RL; Dorioz JM
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):157-66. PubMed ID: 12079098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reuse of wastewater in aboriginal communities in Western Australia.
Mathew K; Ho GE; Anda M
Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 2000; 105():233-9. PubMed ID: 10842820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A conceptual framework of agricultural land use planning with BMP for integrated watershed management.
Qi H; Altinakar MS
J Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 92(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 20863609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Who's in charge: role clarity in a Midwestern watershed group.
Floress K; Prokopy LS; Ayres J
Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 48(4):825-34. PubMed ID: 21853280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
