332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23913915)
1. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.
Gomes M; Díaz-Ordaz K; Grieve R; Kenward MG
Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing appropriate methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of cluster randomized trials.
Gomes M; Ng ES; Grieve R; Nixon R; Carpenter J; Thompson SG
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(2):350-61. PubMed ID: 22016450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple imputation methods for bivariate outcomes in cluster randomised trials.
DiazOrdaz K; Kenward MG; Gomes M; Grieve R
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3482-96. PubMed ID: 26990655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.
Marshall A; Altman DG; Royston P; Holder RL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20085642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches for missing covariate data in logistic regression with MNAR sensitivity analyses.
Ward RC; Axon RN; Gebregziabher M
Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1025-1037. PubMed ID: 31957905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple imputation strategies for zero-inflated cost data in economic evaluations: which method works best?
MacNeil Vroomen J; Eekhout I; Dijkgraaf MG; van Hout H; de Rooij SE; Heymans MW; Bosmans JE
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Nov; 17(8):939-950. PubMed ID: 26497027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to deal with missing longitudinal data in cost of illness analysis in Alzheimer's disease-suggestions from the GERAS observational study.
Belger M; Haro JM; Reed C; Happich M; Kahle-Wrobleski K; Argimon JM; Bruno G; Dodel R; Jones RW; Vellas B; Wimo A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():83. PubMed ID: 27430559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials.
Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W; Kennedy K; Xie F
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jul; 21(5):717-728. PubMed ID: 32108274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of methods for handling missing data on immunohistochemical markers in survival analysis of breast cancer.
Ali AM; Dawson SJ; Blows FM; Provenzano E; Ellis IO; Baglietto L; Huntsman D; Caldas C; Pharoah PD
Br J Cancer; 2011 Feb; 104(4):693-9. PubMed ID: 21266980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials.
Bailey BE; Andridge R; Shoben AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 32228491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Scoping Review of Item-Level Missing Data in Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Ling X; Gabrio A; Mason A; Baio G
Value Health; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1654-1662. PubMed ID: 35341690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: Scoping review and new results.
Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):840-860. PubMed ID: 32510791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian hierarchical models for cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from cluster randomized trials.
Grieve R; Nixon R; Thompson SG
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 19675321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multiple imputation approach for MNAR mechanisms compatible with Heckman's model.
Galimard JE; Chevret S; Protopopescu C; Resche-Rigon M
Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):2907-20. PubMed ID: 26893215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
