155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23914171)
1. Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study.
Mizuno K; Tsuji T; Rossetti Y; Pisella L; Ohde H; Liu M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():432. PubMed ID: 23914171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: a study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145.
Shigeto H; Tobimatsu S; Yamamoto T; Kobayashi T; Kato M
J Neurol Sci; 1998 Apr; 156(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 9588856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial and temporal dynamics of visual search tasks distinguish subtypes of unilateral spatial neglect: Comparison of two cases with viewer-centered and stimulus-centered neglect.
Mizuno K; Kato K; Tsuji T; Shindo K; Kobayashi Y; Liu M
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 26(4):610-34. PubMed ID: 26059555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of the visual evoked magnetic field with the m-sequence technique.
Tabuchi H; Yokoyama T; Shimogawara M; Shiraki K; Nagasaka E; Miki T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):2045-54. PubMed ID: 12037017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Striate cortical generators of the N75, P100 and N145 components localized by pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic fields.
Hatanaka K; Nakasato N; Seki K; Kanno A; Mizoi K; Yoshimoto T
Tohoku J Exp Med; 1997 May; 182(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9241768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction between spatial neglect and attention deficit in patients with right hemisphere damage.
Takamura Y; Fujii S; Ohmatsu S; Ikuno K; Tanaka K; Manji A; Abe H; Morioka S; Kawashima N
Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():331-346. PubMed ID: 34126288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effects on neglect: a visual-evoked potential study.
Pitzalis S; Spinelli D; Vallar G; Di Russo F
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():111. PubMed ID: 23966919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intentional gaze shift to neglected space: a compensatory strategy during recovery after unilateral spatial neglect.
Takamura Y; Imanishi M; Osaka M; Ohmatsu S; Tominaga T; Yamanaka K; Morioka S; Kawashima N
Brain; 2016 Nov; 139(11):2970-2982. PubMed ID: 27663624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pattern reversal visual evoked responses of V1/V2 and V5/MT as revealed by MEG combined with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps.
Barnikol UB; Amunts K; Dammers J; Mohlberg H; Fieseler T; Malikovic A; Zilles K; Niedeggen M; Tass PA
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):86-108. PubMed ID: 16480895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal profile of visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal stimulation analyzed with a whole-head magnetometer.
Hashimoto T; Kashii S; Kikuchi M; Honda Y; Nagamine T; Shibasaki H
Exp Brain Res; 1999 Apr; 125(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 10229028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual evoked cortical magnetic fields to pattern reversal stimulation.
Nakamura A; Kakigi R; Hoshiyama M; Koyama S; Kitamura Y; Shimojo M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1997 Jul; 6(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 9395846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Brentano Illusion Test (BRIT): An implicit task of perceptual processing for the assessment of visual field defects in neglect patients.
Facchin A; Vallar G; Daini R
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 31(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 31438751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unilateral neglect: a theory of proprioceptive space of a stimulus as determined by the cerebellar component of motor efference copy (and is autism a special case of neglect).
Vakalopoulos C
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 68(3):574-600. PubMed ID: 17070652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical course of left spatial neglect with a focus on the assessment of stimulus-driven attention.
Motomura K; Amimoto K
Neurocase; 2021 Dec; 27(6):441-446. PubMed ID: 34763620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.
Di Russo F; Aprile T; Spitoni G; Spinelli D
Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):842-54. PubMed ID: 18024488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A preliminary study of clinical assessment of left unilateral spatial neglect using a head mounted display system (HMD) in rehabilitation engineering technology.
Tanaka T; Sugihara S; Nara H; Ino S; Ifukube T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 2():31. PubMed ID: 16207373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociable coordinate frames of unilateral spatial neglect: "viewer-centered" neglect.
Hillis AE; Rapp B; Benzing L; Caramazza A
Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):491-526. PubMed ID: 9733562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect.
Chokron S; Peyrin C; Perez C
Neuropsychologia; 2019 May; 128():305-314. PubMed ID: 29551364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of visual evoked fields using an MRI-linked whole head MEG system.
Nakasato N; Seki K; Fujita S; Hatanaka K; Kawamura T; Ohtomo S; Kanno A; Ikeda H; Yoshimoto T
Front Med Biol Eng; 1996; 7(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 8956968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length.
Daini R; Angelelli P; Antonucci G; Cappa SF; Vallar G
Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):224-37. PubMed ID: 12012160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
