These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23915027)

  • 1. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?
    Mehl C; Ali S; El Bahra S; Harder S; Vollrath O; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26757337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misfit and microleakage of implant-supported crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques, luted with glass-ionomer, resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents.
    Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Turrión AS; López-Lozano JF; Torres-Lagares D; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23022105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Schwarz D; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 21722192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.