These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Revisiting Tversky's diagnosticity principle. Evers ER; Lakens D Front Psychol; 2014; 5():875. PubMed ID: 25161638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantum projections on conceptual subspaces: A deeper dive into methodological challenges and opportunities. Martínez-Mingo A; Martínez-Huertas JÁ; Olmos R; Jorge-Botana G Sci Prog; 2024; 107(2):368504241238773. PubMed ID: 38614464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on quantum probability theory. Sloman S Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction. Wang Z; Busemeyer JR Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment. Costello F; Watts P Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability effects in probability judgments. Pleskac TJ Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence. Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology. Bruza PD; Wang Z; Busemeyer JR Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 19(7):383-93. PubMed ID: 26058709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. Wang Z; Solloway T; Shiffrin RM; Busemeyer JR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9431-6. PubMed ID: 24979797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments. Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness. Blutner R; Pothos EM; Bruza P Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):711-36. PubMed ID: 24039093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]