These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23915089)

  • 1. Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).
    Benjamin AS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 23915089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: reply to Benjamin (2013).
    Kellen D; Klauer KC; Singmann H
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):727-30. PubMed ID: 23915090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ensemble coding of memory strength in recognition tests.
    Dubé C; Tong K; Westfall H; Bauer E
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):936-953. PubMed ID: 30919277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: the case of recognition memory.
    Kellen D; Klauer KC; Singmann H
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jul; 119(3):457-79. PubMed ID: 22468607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separating decision and encoding noise in signal detection tasks.
    Cabrera CA; Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 26120907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The belief bias effect is aptly named: a reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011).
    Dube C; Rotello CM; Heit E
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 21244191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal detection with criterion noise: applications to recognition memory.
    Benjamin AS; Diaz M; Wee S
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):84-115. PubMed ID: 19159149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical note: Exploring Luce's (1963) low-threshold model applied to recognition memory.
    McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 31192679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision noise: an explanation for observed violations of signal detection theory.
    Mueller ST; Weidemann CT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):465-94. PubMed ID: 18567246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.
    Benjamin AS; Tullis JG; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1601-8. PubMed ID: 23421510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does ROC asymmetry reverse when detecting new stimuli? Reinvestigating whether the retrievability of mnemonic information is task-dependent.
    Meyer-Grant CG; Klauer KC
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):160-174. PubMed ID: 35984624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision criteria do not shift: commentary on Mueller and Weidemann (2008).
    Balakrishnan JD; MacDonald JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Oct; 15(5):1022-30; discussion 1031-34. PubMed ID: 18926999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Generalized Quantum Episodic Memory Model.
    Trueblood JS; Hemmer P
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2089-2125. PubMed ID: 28000965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory framework.
    Silbert NH; Thomas RD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 23090749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for belief bias in a mental model framework: comment on Klauer, Musch, and Naumer (2000).
    Garnham A; Oakhill JV
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Apr; 112(2):509-18; discussion 519-20. PubMed ID: 15783296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).
    Klauer KC; Kellen D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 21244192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generality of likelihood ratio decisions.
    Glanzer M; Hilford A; Kim K; Maloney LT
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103931. PubMed ID: 31276947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):218-244. PubMed ID: 29265853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision criteria in dual discrimination tasks estimated using external-noise methods.
    Zak I; Katkov M; Gorea A; Sagi D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):1042-55. PubMed ID: 22351481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.