135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23915296)
1. Retrieval dynamics in self-terminated memory search.
Hussey EK; Dougherty MR; Harbison JI; Davelaar EJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):394-416. PubMed ID: 23915296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interference and the representation of order within associations.
Rehani M; Caplan JB
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1409-29. PubMed ID: 21598202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the lawfulness of the decision to terminate memory search.
Harbison JI; Dougherty MR; Davelaar EJ; Fayyad B
Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19394922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence against decay in verbal working memory.
Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):380-411. PubMed ID: 22866686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interference from retrieval cues in Parkinson's disease.
Crescentini C; Marin D; Del Missier F; Biasutti E; Shallice T
Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):720-33. PubMed ID: 21728428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motivated to retrieve: how often are you willing to go back to the well when the well is dry?
Dougherty MR; Harbison JI
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1108-17. PubMed ID: 17983316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A computational model of prefrontal control in free recall: strategic memory use in the California Verbal Learning Task.
Becker S; Lim J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):821-32. PubMed ID: 14511535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.
Conway AR; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Dec; 123(4):354-73. PubMed ID: 7996121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expanding the scope of memory search: Modeling intralist and interlist effects in free recall.
Lohnas LJ; Polyn SM; Kahana MJ
Psychol Rev; 2015 Apr; 122(2):337-63. PubMed ID: 25844876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory.
Hills TT; Todd PM; Jones MN
Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):513-34. PubMed ID: 26097107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic search and working memory in social recall.
Hills TT; Pachur T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):218-28. PubMed ID: 21859235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
Unsworth N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]