216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23915860)
1. Risk of malignancy index validity assessment in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with adnexal tumors.
Terzic M; Dotlic J; Likic I; Brndusic N; Pilic I; Ladjevic N; Maricic S; Arsenovic N; Maricic Z
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 23915860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive Value of Malignancy Risk Indices for Ovarian Masses in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.
Ertas S; Vural F; Vural F; Tufekci EC; Ertas AC; Kose G; Aka N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):2177-83. PubMed ID: 27221915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.
Simsek HS; Tokmak A; Ozgu E; Doganay M; Danisman N; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7793-7. PubMed ID: 25292065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of the risk of malignancy index scoring systems (1-4) used in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Ozbay PO; Ekinci T; Caltekin MD; Yilmaz HT; Temur M; Yilmaz O; Uysal S; Demirel E; Kelekci S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):345-9. PubMed ID: 25640377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ultrasound score, CA125, menopausal status, and risk of malignancy index in differentiating between benign and borderline or malignant ovarian tumors.
Leelahakorn S; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S; Thongsuksai P; Jaroenchainon P; Jivangkul C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S22-30. PubMed ID: 17718292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in women with adnexal masses in Wales.
Abdulrahman GO; McKnight L; Lutchman Singh K
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 53(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 25286794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of suspicious pelvic masses using the Pelvic Mass Index (PMI) scoring system from 2007 to 2014.
Sinha A; Drews F; Lim K; Pugh ND
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():79-84. PubMed ID: 27082132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histopathological diagnoses of adnexal masses: which parameters are relevant in preoperative assessment?
Terzic M; Dotlic J; Brndusic N; Arsenovic N; Likic I; Ladjevic N; Maricic S; Andrijasevic S
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):700-8. PubMed ID: 24191504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addition of parity to the risk of malignancy index score in evaluating adnexal masses.
Yavuzcan A; Çağlar M; Özgü E; Üstün Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Güngör T; Kumru S
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 25510694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of adnexal masses: correlation between clinical, ultrasound and histopathological findings.
Dotlić J; Terzić M; Likić I; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Oct; 68(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 22165752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilization of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in the preoperative assessment of patients with adnexal masses.
Terzic M; Dotlic J; Bila J; Pilic I; Nikolic B; Kocijancic D; Likic I; Arsenovic N; Mihailovic T; Bugarski D
J BUON; 2015; 20(3):862-9. PubMed ID: 26214641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian fibroma/fibrothecoma: retrospective cohort study shows limited value of risk of malignancy index score.
Numanoglu C; Kuru O; Sakinci M; Akbayır O; Ulker V
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 53(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 23611791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative multimodal strategies for risk assessment of adnexal masses: analysis of 1362 cases in a gynecologic cancer center.
Radosa MP; Camara O; Vorwergk J; Diebolder H; Winzer H; Mothes A; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Aug; 21(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21633301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
