BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916352)

  • 1. Cervical zygapophyseal joints: geometrical parameters and relationship to cervical kinematics.
    Nowitzke A; Westaway M; Bogduk N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1994 Nov; 9(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 23916352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The orientation of the articular facets of the zygapophyseal joints at the cervical and upper thoracic region.
    Pal GP; Routal RV; Saggu SK
    J Anat; 2001 Apr; 198(Pt 4):431-41. PubMed ID: 11327205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Composite motion in cervical disc segments.
    Milne N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1993 Jul; 8(4):193-202. PubMed ID: 23915969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A morphometric investigation on breed-specific features affecting sagittal rotational and lateral bending mobility in the canine cervical spine (c3-c7).
    Breit S; Künzel W
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 15239817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osteophytes on the zygapophyseal (facet) joints of the cervical spine (C3-C7): A skeletal study.
    Ezra D; Kedar E; Salame K; Alperovitch-Najenson D; Hershkovitz I
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2022 May; 305(5):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 34463041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do sagittal plane anatomical variations (angulation) of the cervical facets and C2 odontoid affect the geometrical configuration of the cervical lordosis?
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Haas JW; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Clin Anat; 2005 Mar; 18(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 15696531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
    Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.
    Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphologic evaluation of cervical and lumbar facet joints: intra-articular facet block considerations.
    Senoglu N; Senoglu M; Safavi-Abbasi S; Shedd SA; Crawford NR
    Pain Pract; 2010; 10(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 20230452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical Facet Orientation Varies with Age in Children: An MRI Study.
    Pesenti S; Lafage R; Lafage V; Panuel M; Blondel B; Jouve JL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(9):e57. PubMed ID: 29715228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo analysis of cervical range of motion after 4- and 5-level subaxial cervical spine fusion.
    Bechara BP; Bell KM; Hartman RA; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E23-9. PubMed ID: 21508893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
    Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of zygapophysial joint orientation and uncinate processes in controlling motion in the cervical spine.
    Milne N
    J Anat; 1991 Oct; 178():189-201. PubMed ID: 1810926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphological aspects and biomechanical properties of the vertebroaxial joint (C2-C3).
    Mestdagh H
    Acta Morphol Neerl Scand; 1976 Feb; 14(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 1274679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine.
    Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Weisshaar CL; Guarino BB; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071004. PubMed ID: 21823743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
    Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of the intact and destabilized sheep cervical spine.
    DeVries NA; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E957-63. PubMed ID: 22391441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.