234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916416)
1. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.
Galesic M; Garcia-Retamero R; Gigerenzer G
Health Psychol; 2009 Mar; 28(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 19290713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Tabular and Icon Fact Box Formats on Comprehension of Benefits and Harms of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial.
McDowell M; Gigerenzer G; Wegwarth O; Rebitschek FG
Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 30799691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
Gaissmaier W; Wegwarth O; Skopec D; Müller AS; Broschinski S; Politi MC
Health Psychol; 2012 May; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 21842998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].
Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
Soc Sci Med; 2010 Apr; 70(7):1019-25. PubMed ID: 20116159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Dickson M; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Kahn VC; Exe NL; Valerio M; Holtzman LG; Scherer LD; Fagerlin A
Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 24246564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Communication of Global Cardiovascular Risk by Avatars.
Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Karanam C; Krishnamurthy D; Niño L; Anam R; Sharit J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():341-4. PubMed ID: 27046602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Visual Aids to Enhance Physician-Patient Discussions and Increase Health Literacy.
Pratt M; Searles GE
J Cutan Med Surg; 2017; 21(6):497-501. PubMed ID: 28614954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks.
Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Aug; 84(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 20728298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving risk understanding across ability levels: Encouraging active processing with dynamic icon arrays.
Okan Y; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Maldonado A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Jun; 21(2):178-94. PubMed ID: 25938975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Smith DM; Ubel PA; Fagerlin A
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 17652180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates.
Brown SM; Culver JO; Osann KE; MacDonald DJ; Sand S; Thornton AA; Grant M; Bowen DJ; Metcalfe KA; Burke HB; Robson ME; Friedman S; Weitzel JN
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Apr; 83(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 20554149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On avoiding framing effects in experienced decision makers.
Garcia-Retamero R; Dhami MK
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(4):829-42. PubMed ID: 23098268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.
Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
Keller C; Siegrist M
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving informed consent to chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial of written information versus an interactive multimedia CD-ROM.
Olver IN; Whitford HS; Denson LA; Peterson MJ; Olver SI
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 18945572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
