These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916429)

  • 1. Sagittal and vertical aspects of Class II division 1 subjects according to the respiratory pattern.
    Cabrera Lde C; Retamoso LB; Mei RM; Tanaka O
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):30-5. PubMed ID: 23916429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between the curve of Spee and craniofacial variables: A regression analysis.
    Halimi A; Benyahia H; Azeroual MF; Bahije L; Zaoui F
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):361-373. PubMed ID: 29685399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mouth breathing children and cephalometric pattern: does the stage of dental development matter?
    Souki BQ; Lopes PB; Pereira TB; Franco LP; Becker HM; Oliveira DD
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 22425033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial and dental alterations according to the breathing pattern.
    Retamoso LB; Knop LA; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka OM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Apr; 19(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 21552720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
    Yoon SS; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of mouth breathing on facial skeletal development in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhao Z; Zheng L; Huang X; Li C; Liu J; Hu Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):108. PubMed ID: 33691678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in facial morphology after adenotonsillectomy in mouth-breathing children.
    Mattar SE; Valera FC; Faria G; Matsumoto MA; Anselmo-Lima WT
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Sep; 21(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 21599769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Occlusal plane control in hyperdivergents: regarding one case].
    Rerhrhaye W; Zaoui F; Aalloula el H
    Int Orthod; 2009 Jun; 7(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 20303911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Binda SK; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maertens JK; van 't Hof MA
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
    Das UM; Reddy D
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics.
    Fogle LL; Southard KA; Southard TE; Casko JS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 15067261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparision of orofacial airway dimensions in subject with different breathing pattern.
    Ucar FI; Uysal T
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 23260531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overjet reduction and molar correction in fixed appliance treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusions: sagittal and vertical components.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 9878953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.