These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916439)

  • 1. Maxillary incisor retraction: evaluation of different mechanisms.
    Ruellas AC; Pithon MM; dos Santos RL
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 23916439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
    Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Maxillary Dentition during En-masse Retraction with Implant Anchorage.
    Suzuki M; Sueishi K; Katada H; Togo S
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2019 Feb; 60(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 30700640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anchorage capacity between implant and headgear during anterior segment retraction.
    Li F; Hu HK; Chen JW; Liu ZP; Li GF; He SS; Zou SJ; Ye QS
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):915-22. PubMed ID: 21299412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S15-23. PubMed ID: 25138361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects of intrusion arches and mini-implant systems in deepbite patients.
    Senışık NE; Türkkahraman H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):723-33. PubMed ID: 22640674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous Intrusion and Retraction of Maxillary Incisors with a Three Piece Intrusion Arch and Mini-screw Implants: A Case Report.
    Shah A; Araujo E
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016 Summer; 27(2):43-46. PubMed ID: 29799702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of initial displacement and stresses in the maxillary dentition following en masse retraction using fixed lingual appliance and micro-implants: A finite element analysis.
    Aghera D; Shyagali TR; Kambalya P
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 31302004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of mandibular incisor intrusion obtained using a conventional utility arch vs bone anchorage.
    Aydoğdu E; Özsoy ÖP
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 21469970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.
    Nagaraj K; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 18575310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique.
    Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
    Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.