These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916440)

  • 1. Changes on facial profile in the mixed dentition, from natural growth and induced by Balters' bionator appliance.
    Landázuri DR; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Dib LP; Maia S
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 23916440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudo-Class III malocclusion treatment with Balters' Bionator.
    Giancotti A; Maselli A; Mampieri G; Spanò E
    J Orthod; 2003 Sep; 30(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 14530417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of the Balters bionator in growing Class II patients.
    Antunes CF; Bigliazzi R; Bertoz FA; Ortolani CL; Franchi L; Faltin K
    Angle Orthod; 2013 May; 83(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 23137316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion using Balters Bionator according to the skeletal maturation.
    dos Santos-Pinto PR; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini Júnior LG; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto CC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):43-52. PubMed ID: 24262416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphometric analysis of long-term dentoskeletal effects induced by treatment with Balters bionator.
    Bigliazzi R; Franchi L; Bertoz AP; McNamara JA; Faltin K; Bertoz FA
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Sep; 85(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 25469744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dental modifications produced by the Bionator III appliance.
    Garattini G; Levrini L; Crozzoli P; Levrini A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 9674678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator.
    Lange DW; Kalra V; Broadbent BH; Powers M; Nelson S
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 8702068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
    Faltin KJ; Faltin RM; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Ghiozzi B; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases.
    Rutter RR; Witt E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition.
    Cozza P; Marino A; Mucedero M
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Apr; 26(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 15130043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Colagrossi S
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15222715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects.
    Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 17095741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    De Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Ursi W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12045763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
    Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.
    Yüksel Coşkun E; Esenlik E
    Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e921401. PubMed ID: 32588836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.