BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1953 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916495)

  • 21. Long-Term Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores After Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
    Seuk JW; Bae J; Shin SH; Lee SH
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():e493-e499. PubMed ID: 29920389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].
    Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Tian Y; Liu X
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral technique in performing single-segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion.
    Chen C; Cao X; Zou L; Hao G; Zhou Z; Zhang G
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 10():112. PubMed ID: 26179281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.
    Park Y; Ha JW; Lee YT; Sung NY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1813-23. PubMed ID: 23955260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease].
    Zhang W; Duan L; Shang X; Xu X; Hu Y; He R
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 23672122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
    Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Results and complications after 2-level axial lumbar interbody fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Marchi L; Oliveira L; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 22803626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of Grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine.
    Gong K; Wang Z; Luo Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 20809736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does the Wilson frame assist with optimizing surgical exposure for minimally invasive lumbar fusions?
    Cardoso MJ; Rosner MK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E20. PubMed ID: 20568937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis?
    Kim JS; Lee KY; Lee SH; Lee HY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 20121352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feasibility and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient single-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a surgery center: preliminary results in 16 patients.
    Chin KR; Coombs AV; Seale JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E36-42. PubMed ID: 25271488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
    Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 98.