83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916577)
1. Flow confirmation study for central venous port in oncologic outpatient undergoing chemotherapy: evaluation of suspected system-related mechanical complications.
Sofue K; Arai Y; Takeuchi Y; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e691-6. PubMed ID: 23916577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of a flow confirmation study of a central venous port of the upper arm versus the chest wall in patients with suspected system-related mechanical complications.
Tokue H; Tokue A; Tsushima Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 20(1):91. PubMed ID: 35317828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experiences with ultrasound-guided port implantations via the lateral subclavian vein: a retrospective analysis of 1532 patients].
Chang DH; Boecker J; Hellmich M; Krug KB
Rofo; 2012 Aug; 184(8):726-33. PubMed ID: 22618474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Port-a-Cath extravasation of vesicant cytotoxics: surgical options for a rare complication of cancer chemotherapy.
Haslik W; Hacker S; Felberbauer FX; Thallinger C; Bartsch R; Kornauth C; Deutschmann C; Mader RM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 25515823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct translumbar inferior vena cava ports for long-term central venous access in patients with cancer.
Butros SR; Walker TG; Salazar GM; Kalva SP; Oklu R; Wicky S; Ganguli S
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 24507994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central venous port system-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Tsutsumi S; Fukasawa T; Fujii T; Tabe Y; Kigure W; Asao T; Kuwano H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Jun; 59(116):1079-80. PubMed ID: 22580658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical thrombolysis of thrombosed central venous port.
Oh JS; Choi BG; Chun HJ; Lee HG
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2014 Oct; 37(5):1358-62. PubMed ID: 25085243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiologic removal and replacement of port-catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.
Iguchi T; Inaba Y; Arai Y; Yamaura H; Sato Y; Miyazaki M; Shimamoto H; Hayashi T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1579-84. PubMed ID: 17114553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central venous access port-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Inaba Y; Yamaura H; Sato Y; Najima M; Shimamoto H; Nishiofuku H; Ura T; Muro K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 37(12):951-4. PubMed ID: 18057011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous Re-positioning of Dislocated Port-Catheters in Patients with Dysfunctional Central-Vein Port-Systems.
Massmann A; Jagoda P; Kranzhoefer N; Buecker A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4124-9. PubMed ID: 25854845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of totally implantable central venous port system infections in an urban tertiary referral center.
Krümpelmann U; Boseila A; Löhnert M; Kaup O; Clarenbach JJ; Görner M
J Chemother; 2021 Jul; 33(4):228-237. PubMed ID: 33030416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Safety and effectiveness of central vein catheters indwelling with subcutaneous port in patients undergoing chemotherapy].
Ge F; Cang J; Xue ZG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 88(33):2331-4. PubMed ID: 19087693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Central venous infusion port inserted via high versus low jugular venous approaches: retrospective comparison of outcome and complications.
Park HS; Kim YI; Lee SH; Kim JI; Seo H; Lee SM; Lee Y; Lim MK; Park YS
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):494-8. PubMed ID: 19200682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Farrell M; Awantang R; Herzog TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experience with an implantable venous access system for chemotherapy.
Pettengell R; Davies AJ; Harvey VJ
N Z Med J; 1991 Jul; 104(915):284-5. PubMed ID: 1852329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.
Teichgräber UK; Streitparth F; Cho CH; Benter T; Gebauer B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy.
Ng F; Mastoroudes H; Paul E; Davies N; Tibballs J; Hochhauser D; Mayer A; Begent R; Meyer T
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Sep; 19(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 17517500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].
Lenhart M; Schätzler S; Manke C; Strotzer M; Seitz J; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Herold T; Paetzel C
Rofo; 2010 Jan; 182(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19536729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
