These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2391666)

  • 1. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential.
    Khers SC; Carpenter CW; Vetter JD; Staley RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 2391666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pattern of maxillary and mandibular proximal enamel thickness at the contact area of the permanent dentition from first molar to first molar.
    Sarig R; Vardimon AD; Sussan C; Benny L; Sarne O; Hershkovitz I; Shpack N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 25836003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence rates for complete cusp fracture.
    Bader JD; Martin JA; Shugars DA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 29(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 11553107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel-dentine junction shape.
    Smith TM; Olejniczak AJ; Reid DJ; Ferrell RJ; Hublin JJ
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(11):974-95. PubMed ID: 16814245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Liu Y; Xu J; Rong Q; Pan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24836532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in enamel thickness and cusp area within human maxillary molars and its bearing on scaling techniques used for studies of enamel thickness between species.
    Macho GA
    Arch Oral Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):783-92. PubMed ID: 7802614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices.
    Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Creugers NH; Burgersdijk RC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 12475162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars.
    Krishan R; Paqué F; Ossareh A; Kishen A; Dao T; Friedman S
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25069925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults.
    Eakle WS; Maxwell EH; Braly BV
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Feb; 112(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 3456380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of human incisors and premolars: morphological and patho-anatomical factors.
    Schatz D; Alfter G; Göz G
    Dent Traumatol; 2001 Aug; 17(4):167-73. PubMed ID: 11585143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment.
    Stroud JL; English J; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Apr; 68(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9564423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual variation in enamel structure of human mandibular first premolars.
    Stern D; Skobe Z
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1985 Oct; 68(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 4061610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentin horn angle and enamel thickness interactively control tooth resilience and bite force.
    Chai H
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Jul; 75():279-286. PubMed ID: 29874598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentin and enamel thickness.
    Stroud JL; Buschang PH; Goaz PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 7835519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture properties of human teeth in proximity to the dentinoenamel junction.
    Rasmussen ST
    J Dent Res; 1984 Nov; 63(11):1279-83. PubMed ID: 6594369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.