These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916796)

  • 1. Pregnancies and deliveries per fresh cycle are no longer adequate indicators of in vitro fertilization program quality: how should registries adapt?
    Meldrum DR
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):620-1. PubMed ID: 23916796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumer-friendly reporting of in vitro fertilization outcomes.
    Chetkowski RJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):e7. PubMed ID: 24289996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply of the author.
    Meldrum DR
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):e8-9. PubMed ID: 24289997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reply of the authors.
    Meldrum DR
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):e31-2. PubMed ID: 23993884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining assisted reproductive technology success.
    Kushnir VA; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):e30. PubMed ID: 23993885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in vitro fertilization registry 2.0.
    Meldrum D
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1212-3. PubMed ID: 24112526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
    Grifo JA; Noyes N
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward.
    Maddern GJ; Smith JA; Babidge W; Guy GS
    Med J Aust; 2011 Sep; 195(5):266. PubMed ID: 21895591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstetric Safety and Quality.
    Pettker CM; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 26241273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How effective is in vitro fertilization, and how can it be improved?
    Stewart LM; Holman CD; Hart R; Finn J; Mai Q; Preen DB
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1677-83. PubMed ID: 21316660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Not Available].
    Klakow-Franck R
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(9-10):647-9. PubMed ID: 26699251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring Data Quality: A Review of the Literature between 2005 and 2013.
    Stausberg J; Nasseh D; Nonnemacher M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():712-6. PubMed ID: 25991245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG;
    Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1158-76. PubMed ID: 15665021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cumulative delivery rate in an in vitro fertilization program with a single embryo transfer policy.
    Sundström P; Saldeen P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 19455443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IVF versus spontaneous twin pregnancies--which are at higher risk of complications?
    Szymusik I; Kosinska-Kaczynska K; Bomba-Opon D; Wielgos M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2725-8. PubMed ID: 22788783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Indicators, in the service of quality].
    Leprohon J
    Infirm Que; 2000; 7(5):26-37. PubMed ID: 12942816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.
    Scott RT; Upham KM; Forman EJ; Hong KH; Scott KL; Taylor D; Tao X; Treff NR
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 23731996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National reporting of in vitro fertilization success rates: how do we get patients useful information?
    Cedars MI
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1210-1. PubMed ID: 24103637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missed opportunities for quality improvement.
    Ho K; Kelley E; Brady J; Clancy CM
    Am J Med Qual; 2007; 22(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 17656734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ART register data on delivery rates.
    Ata B; Urman B
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Mar; 25(3):805-6; author reply 806-7. PubMed ID: 19965876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.