These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The cost implications of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery at one year. Lamy A; Tong W; Devereaux PJ; Gao P; Gafni A; Singh K; Taggart D; Straka Z; Akar AR; Piegas L; Ou Y; Yusuf S Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 98(5):1620-5. PubMed ID: 25261272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with coronary artery disease: Results from the MASS III trial. Scudeler TL; Hueb WA; Farkouh ME; Maron DJ; de Soárez PC; Campolina AG; Takiuti ME; Rezende PC; Godoy LC; Hueb AC; Lima EG; Garzillo CL; Ramires JAF; Kalil Filho R Int J Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 273():63-68. PubMed ID: 30158068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing cost aspects of coronary artery bypass graft surgery with coronary artery stenting. Birim Ö; Bogers AJ; Kappetein AP J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2012 Oct; 53(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 22252542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: Results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Hattler B; Messenger JC; Shroyer AL; Collins JF; Haugen SJ; Garcia JA; Baltz JH; Cleveland JC; Novitzky D; Grover FL; Circulation; 2012 Jun; 125(23):2827-35. PubMed ID: 22592900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in health-related quality of life in off-pump versus on-pump cardiac surgery: Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass trial. Bishawi M; Shroyer AL; Rumsfeld JS; Spertus JA; Baltz JH; Collins JF; Quin JA; Almassi GH; Grover FL; Hattler B; Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 95(6):1946-51. PubMed ID: 23453761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing off-pump and on-pump clinical outcomes and costs for diabetic cardiac surgery patients. Shroyer AL; Hattler B; Wagner TH; Baltz JH; Collins JF; Carr BM; Almassi GH; Quin JA; Hawkins RB; Kozora E; Bishawi M; Ebrahimi R; Grover FL; Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Jul; 98(1):38-44; discussion 44-5. PubMed ID: 24841548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. Puskas JD; Williams WH; Mahoney EM; Huber PR; Block PC; Duke PG; Staples JR; Glas KE; Marshall JJ; Leimbach ME; McCall SA; Petersen RJ; Bailey DE; Weintraub WS; Guyton RA JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1841-9. PubMed ID: 15100202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Cohen DJ; Osnabrugge RL; Magnuson EA; Wang K; Li H; Chinnakondepalli K; Pinto D; Abdallah MS; Vilain KA; Morice MC; Dawkins KD; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW; Serruys PW; Circulation; 2014 Sep; 130(14):1146-57. PubMed ID: 25085960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass: findings from PREVENT IV. Magee MJ; Alexander JH; Hafley G; Ferguson TB; Gibson CM; Harrington RA; Peterson ED; Califf RM; Kouchoukos NT; Herbert MA; Mack MJ; Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):494-9; discussion 499-500. PubMed ID: 18222251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. Nathoe HM; van Dijk D; Jansen EW; Suyker WJ; Diephuis JC; van Boven WJ; de la Rivière AB; Borst C; Kalkman CJ; Grobbee DE; Buskens E; de Jaegere PP; N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 12556542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five years follow-up after Y-graft arterial revascularization: on pump versus off pump; prospective clinical trial. Ramadan AS; Stefanidis C; N'Gatchou W; El Oumeiri B; Jansens JL; De Smet JM; Antoine M; De Cannière D Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Mar; 10(3):423-7. PubMed ID: 19995794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fate at mid-term follow-up of the on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Nardi P; Pellegrino A; Bassano C; Mani R; Chiariello GA; Zeitani J; Chiariello L J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2015 Feb; 16(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 25022926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the best bypass surgery trial. Møller CH; Perko MJ; Lund JT; Andersen LW; Kelbaek H; Madsen JK; Winkel P; Gluud C; Steinbrüchel DA Circulation; 2010 Feb; 121(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 20083683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years in a randomized controlled trial. Al-Ruzzeh S; Epstein D; George S; Bustami M; Wray J; Ilsley C; Sculpher M; Amrani M Artif Organs; 2008 Nov; 32(11):891-7. PubMed ID: 18959683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial. Zenati MA; Shroyer AL; Collins JF; Hattler B; Ota T; Almassi GH; Amidi M; Novitzky D; Grover FL; Sonel AF J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 141(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 21130476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of intraoperative conversion from off-pump to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on costs and quality of life: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Shiga T; Apfel CC; Wajima Z; Ohe Y J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Dec; 21(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 18068054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. Mack MJ; Pfister A; Bachand D; Emery R; Magee MJ; Connolly M; Subramanian V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 14752427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term clinical and economic analysis of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the cypher sirolimus-eluting stent: 3-year results from the ENDEAVOR III trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). Eisenstein EL; Leon MB; Kandzari DE; Mauri L; Edwards R; Kong DF; Cowper PA; Anstrom KJ; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1199-207. PubMed ID: 20129546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]