BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23916981)

  • 1. Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio, substrate mix ratio and inoculum source on batch co-digestion of grass and pig manure.
    Dechrugsa S; Kantachote D; Chaiprapat S
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 146():101-108. PubMed ID: 23916981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of inoculum source and co-digestion strategies on anaerobic digestion of residues generated in the treatment of waste vegetable oils.
    Hidalgo D; Martín-Marroquín JM
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Sep; 142():17-22. PubMed ID: 24794521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response surface optimization of methane potentials in anaerobic co-digestion of multiple substrates: dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw.
    Wang X; Yang G; Li F; Feng Y; Ren G
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Jan; 31(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 23188713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models.
    Kafle GK; Chen L
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():492-502. PubMed ID: 26531046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Producing high-strength liquor from mesophilic batch acidification of chicken manure.
    Abendroth C; Wünsche E; Luschnig O; Bürger C; Günther T
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Mar; 33(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 25672618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of manure of guinea pig with lignocellulosic Andean residues.
    Meneses Quelal WO; Velázquez-Martí B; Gaibor Chávez J; Niño Ruiz Z; Ferrer Gisbert A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(2):2227-2243. PubMed ID: 34363173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with food wastes via bio-methane potential assay and CSTR reactor.
    Ye Y; Zamalloa C; Lin H; Yan M; Schmidt D; Hu B
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2015; 50(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 25602155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of temperature on continuous dry fermentation of swine manure.
    Deng L; Chen C; Zheng D; Yang H; Liu Y; Chen Z
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 177():247-52. PubMed ID: 27107950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical insights into anaerobic co-digestion of wheat straw with food waste and cattle manure: Synergistic effects on biogas yield and kinetic modeling.
    Rahmani AM; Tyagi VK; Ahmed B; Kazmi AA; Ojha CSP; Singh R
    Environ Res; 2022 Sep; 212(Pt C):113382. PubMed ID: 35568237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The biomethanation of cow manure in a continuous anaerobic digester can be boosted via a bioaugmentation culture containing Bathyarchaeota.
    Li Y; Zhao J; Achinas S; Zhang Z; Krooneman J; Euverink GJW
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 745():141042. PubMed ID: 32736108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified batch anaerobic digestion assay for testing efficiencies of trace metal additives to enhance methane production of energy crops.
    Brulé M; Bolduan R; Seidelt S; Schlagermann P; Bott A
    Environ Technol; 2013; 34(13-16):2047-58. PubMed ID: 24350458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dry anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung with pig manure for methane production.
    Li J; Jha AK; Bajracharya TR
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2014 Jul; 173(6):1537-52. PubMed ID: 24818871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage.
    Xie S; Lawlor PG; Frost JP; Hu Z; Zhan X
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(10):5728-33. PubMed ID: 21444203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of anaerobic digester inoculum preservation via lyophilization on methane recovery.
    Yarberry A; Lansing S; Luckarift H; Diltz R; Mulbry W; Yarwood S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():62-70. PubMed ID: 31109562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of inoculum's origin on the methane yield of different substrates in biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests.
    Koch K; Lippert T; Drewes JE
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 243():457-463. PubMed ID: 28688329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of agricultural substrates to improve methane yield in anaerobic co-digestion with pig slurry: effect of substrate type and inclusion level.
    Ferrer P; Cambra-López M; Cerisuelo A; Peñaranda DS; Moset V
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jan; 34(1):196-203. PubMed ID: 24238994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement in CH
    Poulsen TG; Adelard L; Wells M
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():179-187. PubMed ID: 27876567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Batch and continuous biogas production from grass silage liquor.
    Abu-Dahrieh J; Orozco A; Groom E; Rooney D
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Dec; 102(23):10922-8. PubMed ID: 21993325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In search of the optimal inoculum to substrate ratio during anaerobic co-digestion of spent coffee grounds and cow manure.
    Akyol Ç
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Nov; 38(11):1278-1283. PubMed ID: 32356493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and orthophosphate release from anaerobic digestion of Microcystis spp.
    Zeng S; Yuan X; Shi X; Qiu Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):89-93. PubMed ID: 20138427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.