189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917280)
1. Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional.
Green RC; Lupski JR; Biesecker LG
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):365-6. PubMed ID: 23917280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making.
Ross LF; Rothstein MA; Clayton EW
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 23917281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care.
Klitzman R; Appelbaum PS; Chung W
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 23917282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic test validation for incidental findings.
Park JY; Fortina P; Kricka LJ
Clin Chem; 2014 Feb; 60(2):292-3. PubMed ID: 23818443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
McGuire AL; Joffe S; Koenig BA; Biesecker BB; McCullough LB; Blumenthal-Barby JS; Caulfield T; Terry SF; Green RC
Science; 2013 May; 340(6136):1047-8. PubMed ID: 23686340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Regier DA; Peacock SJ; Pataky R; van der Hoek K; Jarvik GP; Hoch J; Veenstra D
CMAJ; 2015 Apr; 187(6):E190-E197. PubMed ID: 25754703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revealing the incidentalome when targeting the tumor genome.
Bombard Y; Robson M; Offit K
JAMA; 2013 Aug; 310(8):795-6. PubMed ID: 23982363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical signposts for clinical geneticists in secondary variant and incidental finding disclosure discussions.
Christenhusz GM; Devriendt K; Van Esch H; Dierickx K
Med Health Care Philos; 2015 Aug; 18(3):361-70. PubMed ID: 25407129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.
Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 32000764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Christenhusz GM; Devriendt K; Dierickx K
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Mar; 21(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 22739341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive genetic testing for adult-onset disorders in minors: a critical analysis of the arguments for and against the 2013 ACMG guidelines.
Anderson JA; Hayeems RZ; Shuman C; Szego MJ; Monfared N; Bowdin S; Zlotnik Shaul R; Meyn MS
Clin Genet; 2015 Apr; 87(4):301-10. PubMed ID: 25046648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings.
Boardman F; Hale R
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2018 Nov; 6(6):1079-1096. PubMed ID: 30370638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH
J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 24872596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining categories of actionability for secondary findings in next-generation sequencing.
Moret C; Mauron A; Fokstuen S; Makrythanasis P; Hurst SA
J Med Ethics; 2017 May; 43(5):346-349. PubMed ID: 28039284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Return of results: not that complicated?
Evans JP; Rothschild BB
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):358-60. PubMed ID: 22481183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M; Hanish A; Johnson VA; Shah LL; Simon CM; Williams JK
Clin Genet; 2013 Jul; 84(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23590238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grappling with genomic incidental findings in the clinical realm.
Hull SC; Berkman BE
Chest; 2014 Feb; 145(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 24493507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finding common ground.
Evans JP
Genet Med; 2013 Nov; 15(11):852-3. PubMed ID: 24136615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting practices for variants of uncertain significance from next generation sequencing technologies.
Vears DF; Sénécal K; Borry P
Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Oct; 60(10):553-558. PubMed ID: 28774848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
