193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917282)
1. Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care.
Klitzman R; Appelbaum PS; Chung W
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 23917282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional.
Green RC; Lupski JR; Biesecker LG
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):365-6. PubMed ID: 23917280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making.
Ross LF; Rothstein MA; Clayton EW
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 23917281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.
Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 32000764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Regier DA; Peacock SJ; Pataky R; van der Hoek K; Jarvik GP; Hoch J; Veenstra D
CMAJ; 2015 Apr; 187(6):E190-E197. PubMed ID: 25754703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
McGuire AL; Joffe S; Koenig BA; Biesecker BB; McCullough LB; Blumenthal-Barby JS; Caulfield T; Terry SF; Green RC
Science; 2013 May; 340(6136):1047-8. PubMed ID: 23686340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What would you do?: an investigation into Jewish biomedical ethics.
Kenigsberg K; Reisner AI; Davidowitz-Farkas Z; Fins JJ; Breitowitz YA; Grumet Z; Berkowitz AK
Shma; 1995 Sep; 26(496):1-8. PubMed ID: 11660114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Error reporting and disclosure systems: views from hospital leaders.
Weissman JS; Annas CL; Epstein AM; Schneider EC; Clarridge B; Kirle L; Gatsonis C; Feibelmann S; Ridley N
JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(11):1359-66. PubMed ID: 15769969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconceptualising the Interest in Knowing One's Origins: A Case for Mandatory Disclosure.
Wade K
Med Law Rev; 2020 Dec; 28(4):731-752. PubMed ID: 33118029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandatory reporting of domestic violence. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 200.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women
ACOG Comm Opin; 1998 Mar; No. 200():3 p. PubMed ID: 11660575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidental findings: patients' knowledge, rights, and preferences.
Parker LS; Majeske RA
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 7496026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pediatric Professionals' Attitudes about Secondary Findings in Genomic Sequencing of Children.
Barajas M; Ross LF
J Pediatr; 2015 May; 166(5):1276-1282.e7. PubMed ID: 25726921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic counseling: making room for beneficence.
Botkin JR
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 7496028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Issues presented by mandatory reporting requirements to researchers of child abuse and neglect.
Sieber JE
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finding common ground.
Evans JP
Genet Med; 2013 Nov; 15(11):852-3. PubMed ID: 24136615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Next-Generation Sequencing and the Return of Results.
Knoppers BM; Nguyen MT; Sénécal K; Tassé AM; Zawati MH
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2016 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 27599532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic counseling, non-directiveness, and clients' values: is what clients say, what they mean?
Wilfond BS; Baker D
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 7496027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public policy versus private rights: the medical, social, ethical, and legal implications of the testing of newborns for HIV.
Ploughman P
AIDS Public Policy J; 1995-1996 Winter; 10(4):182-204. PubMed ID: 11654732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues in state newborn screening programs.
Clayton EW
Pediatrics; 1992 Oct; 90(4):641-6. PubMed ID: 1344065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
