These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917328)

  • 1. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration of coronary calcium scores determined using iterative image reconstruction (AIDR 3D) at 120, 100, and 80 kVp.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Goatman KA; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1921. PubMed ID: 27036588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose reduction at coronary artery calcium scoring by using a low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Matsuura N; Urashima M; Fukumoto W; Sunamori H; Tatsugami F; Toyota N; Awai K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
    Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
    Schindler A; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Blanke P; Ebersberger U; Cho YJ; Allmendinger T; Vogt S; Raupach R; Fink C; Saam T; Bamberg F; Nikolaou K; Apfaltrer P
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
    McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
    McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controversies about effects of low-kilovoltage MDCT acquisition on Agatston calcium scoring.
    Deprez FC; Vlassenbroek A; Ghaye B; Raaijmakers R; Coche E
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 23333185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calcium score of small coronary calcifications on multidetector computed tomography: results from a static phantom study.
    Groen JM; Kofoed KF; Zacho M; Vliegenthart R; Willems TP; Greuter MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):e58-63. PubMed ID: 23092538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Iterative Reconstruction.
    Braber TL; Willemink MJ; Bohté EH; Mosterd A; Leiner T; Velthuis BK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 26720203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison.
    Yin WH; Lu B; Li N; Han L; Hou ZH; Wu RZ; Wu YJ; Niu HX; Jiang SL; Krazinski AW; Ebersberger U; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 24269265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
    Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoleak and in-stent thrombus detection with CT angiography in a thoracic aortic aneurysm phantom at different tube energies using filtered back projection and iterative algorithms.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Mueck F; Geyer LL; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):574-84. PubMed ID: 24475853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The optimal dose reduction level using iterative reconstruction with prospective ECG-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT.
    Hou Y; Xu S; Guo W; Vembar M; Guo Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3905-11. PubMed ID: 23036786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.