These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917591)
1. [Lead survival and complications (except infections). Are we doing better nowadays?]. Seifert M; Neuss M; Schöpp M; Koban C; Butter C Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2013 Sep; 24(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 23917591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulse Generator Exchange Does Not Accelerate the Rate of Electrical Failure in a Recalled Small Caliber ICD Lead. Lovelock JD; Premkumar A; Levy MR; Mengistu A; Hoskins MH; El-Chami MF; Lloyd MS; Leon AR; Langberg JJ; Delurgio DB Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 38(12):1434-8. PubMed ID: 26285670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lead-Dependent Infective Endocarditis: The Role of Factors Predisposing to Its Development in an Analysis of 414 Clinical Cases. Polewczyk A; Jacheć W; Janion M; Podlaski R; Kutarski A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 38(7):846-56. PubMed ID: 25683205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive cultures in asymptomatic patients during elective device replacement: a murderer hides in the darkness or an innocent person on the crime scene? Klug D; Wallet F; Kacet S; Courcol R Europace; 2010 Jan; 12(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 20008492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biventricular defibrillator patients have higher complication rates after revision of recalled leads. Brumberg GE; Kaseer B; Shah H; Saba S; Jain S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):665-71. PubMed ID: 22519559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients without signs of infection undergoing generator replacement or lead revision. Kleemann T; Becker T; Strauss M; Dyck N; Weisse U; Saggau W; Burkhardt U; Seidl K Europace; 2010 Jan; 12(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19861383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extraction of defibrillator leads recalled for cable externalization and failure. Patel D; Adelstein E; Nemec J; Mendenhall GS; Bazaz R; Jain S; Saba S J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 36(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 23179921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lessons from ICD lead recalls: what have we learned? Hauser RG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):650-1. PubMed ID: 22671710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a new high-voltage lead necessary? 6.6-French ICD lead failure: a UK tertiary center experience. Kelly D; Mariathas M; Gough R; Yue AM; Roberts PR; Morgan JM Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 35(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22077138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre. Gomes S; Cranney G; Bennett M; Li A; Giles R Europace; 2014 Sep; 16(9):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24554523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications associated with generator replacement in response to device advisories. Costea A; Rardon DP; Padanilam BJ; Fogel RI; Prystowsky EN J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Mar; 19(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 18081773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications leading to surgical revision in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: comparison of patients with single-chamber, dual-chamber, and biventricular devices. Duray GZ; Schmitt J; Cicek-Hartvig S; Hohnloser SH; Israel CW Europace; 2009 Mar; 11(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 19054788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should all dysfunctional high-voltage leads be extracted? Results of a single-centre long-term registry. Bode F; Himmel F; Reppel M; Mortensen K; Schunkert H; Wiegand UK Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22753865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First clinical experience with the new four-pole standard connector for high-voltage ICD leads. Early results of a multicenter comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Forleo GB; Di Biase L; Mantica M; Panattoni G; Santamaria M; Parisi Q; Sergi D; Papavasileiou LP; Santini L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 38(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23820882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Preprocedural MDCT for Cardiac Implantable Electric Device Lead Extraction: Frequency of Findings That Change Management. Ehieli WL; Boll DT; Marin D; Lewis R; Piccini JP; Hurwitz LM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):770-776. PubMed ID: 28075624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the risk-benefit analysis favor the extraction of failed, sterile pacemaker and defibrillator leads? Venkataraman G; Hayes DL; Strickberger SA J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1413-5. PubMed ID: 19656249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Update on small-diameter implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads performance. van Rees JB; van Welsenes GH; Borleffs CJ; Thijssen J; van der Velde ET; van der Wall EE; van Erven L; Schalij MJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 22352338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter experience with transvenous lead extraction in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Maytin M; Henrikson CA; Schaerf RH; Epstein LM; John RM Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 36(10):1280-3. PubMed ID: 23786517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvenous pacemaker lead removal is safe and effective even in large vegetations: an analysis of 53 cases of pacemaker lead endocarditis. Ruttmann E; Hangler HB; Kilo J; Höfer D; Müller LC; Hintringer F; Müller S; Laufer G; Antretter H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 29(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 16606389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]