These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917801)

  • 1. Ambivalence and its influence on participation in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Oster C; Zajac I; Flight I; Hart E; Young GP; Wilson C; Turnbull D
    Qual Health Res; 2013 Sep; 23(9):1188-201. PubMed ID: 23917801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physician-patient colorectal cancer screening discussions by physicians' screening rates.
    O'Farrell CM; Green BB; Reid RJ; Bowen D; Baldwin LM
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2012; 25(6):771-81. PubMed ID: 23136315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    Paddison JS; Yip MJ
    Aust J Rural Health; 2010 Feb; 18(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 20136809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal cancer screening in first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer: participation, knowledge, and barriers against screening.
    Gimeno García AZ; Quintero E; Nicolás Pérez D; Hernández M; JiménezSosa A
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(12):1165-71. PubMed ID: 21989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.
    Wong MC; John GK; Hirai HW; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ching JY; Ng SS; Chan FK; Griffiths SM; Sung JJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 22836914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening in rural southern Taiwan.
    Lin YH; Kao CC
    Cancer Nurs; 2013; 36(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 22964866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equity of colorectal cancer screening: which groups have inequitable participation and what can we do about it?
    Ward PR; Javanparast S; Wilson C
    Aust J Prim Health; 2011; 17(4):334-46. PubMed ID: 22112702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
    van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To participate or not? Giving voice to gender and socio-economic differences in colorectal cancer screening programmes.
    Molina-Barceló A; Salas Trejo D; Peiró-Pérez R; Málaga López A
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2011 Sep; 20(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21771129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer.
    Lipkus IM; Klein WM
    J Health Commun; 2006 Jun; 11(4):391-407. PubMed ID: 16720537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.
    Fenton JJ; Jerant AF; von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM; Tancredi DJ; Franks P
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2011; 24(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 22086810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trust, choice and obligation: a qualitative study of enablers of colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.
    Ward PR; Coffey C; Meyer S
    Sociol Health Illn; 2015 Sep; 37(7):988-1006. PubMed ID: 25912247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Fault-line of an earthquake": a qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in rural, Eastern North Carolina.
    Jilcott Pitts SB; Lea CS; May CL; Stowe C; Hamill DJ; Walker KT; Fitzgerald TL
    J Rural Health; 2013; 29(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23289658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
    Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manipulating perceptions of colorectal cancer threat: implications for screening intentions and behaviors.
    Lipkus IM; Green LG; Marcus A
    J Health Commun; 2003; 8(3):213-28. PubMed ID: 12857652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Gregory TA; Wilson C; Duncan A; Turnbull D; Cole SR; Young G
    BMC Public Health; 2011 Jan; 11():38. PubMed ID: 21232156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for colorectal cancer: sense and sensibilities.
    Van Hal G; Hoeck S; Van Roosbroeck S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47 Suppl 3():S156-63. PubMed ID: 21943969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowledge, perception and practices of colorectal cancer screening in an ethnically diverse population.
    Koo JH; Arasaratnam MM; Liu K; Redmond DM; Connor SJ; Sung JJ; Leong RW
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 34(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 20580631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Willingness to take a screening test for colorectal cancer: a community-based survey in Malaysia.
    Naing C; Jun YK; Yee WM; Waqiyuddin SJ; Lui LC; Shaung OY; Haw FJ
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2014 Mar; 23(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 23722440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Most participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening out of curiosity about their chances of developing cancer.
    Denters MJ; Bossuyt PM; Deutekom M; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2015 May; 24(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 25734239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.