These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917907)

  • 1. Issues in understanding the impact of the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act on hospital sharps injuries.
    Phillips EK; Conaway M; Parker G; Perry J; Jagger J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 34(9):935-9. PubMed ID: 23917907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology.
    Sohn S; Eagan J; Sepkowitz KA; Zuccotti G
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 25(7):536-42. PubMed ID: 15301024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
    Pugliese G; Germanson TP; Bartley J; Luca J; Lamerato L; Cox J; Jagger J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 22(7):456-8. PubMed ID: 11583216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs associated with sharps injuries in the Swedish health care setting and potential cost savings from needle-stick prevention devices with needle and syringe.
    Glenngård AH; Persson U
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2009; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 19229763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.
    Laramie AK; Pun VC; Fang SC; Kriebel D; Davis L
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 32(6):538-44. PubMed ID: 21558765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sharps injuries in UK health care: a review of injury rates, viral transmission and potential efficacy of safety devices.
    Elder A; Paterson C
    Occup Med (Lond); 2006 Dec; 56(8):566-74. PubMed ID: 17065314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.
    Sossai D; Puro V; Chiappatoli L; Dagnino G; Odone B; Polimeri A; Ruzza L; Palombo P; Fuscoe MS; Scognamiglio P
    Nurs Stand; 2010 Mar 24-30; 24(29):42-6. PubMed ID: 20426370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
    Orenstein R; Reynolds L; Karabaic M; Lamb A; Markowitz SM; Wong ES
    Am J Infect Control; 1995 Dec; 23(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 8821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995.
    Alvarado-Ramy F; Beltrami EM; Short LJ; Srivastava PU; Henry K; Mendelson M; Gerberding JL; Delclos GL; Campbell S; Solomon R; Fahrner R; Culver DH; Bell D; Cardo DM; Chamberland ME
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12602691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.
    Azar-Cavanagh M; Burdt P; Green-McKenzie J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17265397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Safety-Engineered Devices on the Incidence of Occupational Blood and Body Fluid Exposures Among Healthcare Personnel in an Academic Facility, 2000-2014.
    Kanamori H; Weber DJ; DiBiase LM; Pitman KL; Consoli SA; Hill J; Sickbert-Bennett EE; Rutala WA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 May; 37(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 26856246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing non-safety with safety device sharps injury incidence data from two different occupational surveillance systems.
    Mitchell AH; Parker GB; Kanamori H; Rutala WA; Weber DJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Jun; 96(2):195-198. PubMed ID: 28314636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
    Mendelson MH; Lin-Chen BY; Solomon R; Bailey E; Kogan G; Goldbold J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disposal of sharps medical waste in the United States: impact of recommendations and regulations, 1987-2007.
    Perry J; Jagger J; Parker G; Phillips EK; Gomaa A
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 May; 40(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 21824683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chinks in the armor: percutaneous injuries from hollow bore safety-engineered sharps devices.
    Black L
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 May; 41(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 23044172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sharp Decrease of Reported Occupational Blood and Body Fluid Exposures in French Hospitals, 2003-2012: Results of the French National Network Survey, AES-RAISIN.
    Floret N; Ali-Brandmeyer O; L'Hériteau F; Bervas C; Barquins-Guichard S; Pelissier G; Abiteboul D; Parneix P; Bouvet E; Rabaud C;
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 36(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 25896252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.
    Ottino MC; Argentero A; Argentero PA; Garzaro G; Zotti CM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030576. PubMed ID: 31748292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Needlestick injuries in the United States. Epidemiologic, economic, and quality of life issues.
    Lee JM; Botteman MF; Xanthakos N; Nicklasson L
    AAOHN J; 2005 Mar; 53(3):117-33. PubMed ID: 15789967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of multifocused interventions on sharps injury rates at an acute-care hospital.
    Gershon RR; Pearse L; Grimes M; Flanagan PA; Vlahov D
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 20(12):806-11. PubMed ID: 10614603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of safety-engineered device implementation in the prevention of percutaneous injuries: a review of published studies.
    Tuma S; Sepkowitz KA
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Apr; 42(8):1159-70. PubMed ID: 16575737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.