These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917907)

  • 21. Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals.
    Lamontagne F; Abiteboul D; Lolom I; Pellissier G; Tarantola A; Descamps JM; Bouvet E
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17230383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.
    Tosini W; Ciotti C; Goyer F; Lolom I; L'Hériteau F; Abiteboul D; Pellissier G; Bouvet E
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20175681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ouch! Missing the point of needlestick prevention.
    Schuman AJ
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2003 Apr; 90(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 12722954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
    Fukuda H; Yamanaka N
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation.
    Jagger J; Berguer R; Phillips EK; Parker G; Gomaa AE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Apr; 210(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20347743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers.
    Valls V; Lozano MS; Yánez R; Martínez MJ; Pascual F; Lloret J; Ruiz JA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1352-60. PubMed ID: 17994515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of safety needle devices on occupationally acquired needlestick injuries: a four-year prospective study.
    Adams D; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Sep; 64(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 16822584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of a single safety-engineered device on the occurrence of percutaneous injuries in a general hospital in Brazil.
    Menezes JA; Bandeira CS; Quintana M; de Lima E Silva JC; Calvet GA; Brasil P
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 Feb; 42(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 24360640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Costs and benefits of measures to prevent needlestick injuries in a university hospital.
    Roudot-Thoraval F; Montagne O; Schaeffer A; Dubreuil-Lemaire ML; Hachard D; Durand-Zaleski I
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 20(9):614-7. PubMed ID: 10501260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sharps safety stall.
    Barlow RD
    Mater Manag Health Care; 2001 May; 10(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 11373855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.
    Jagger J; Perry J; Gomaa A; Phillips EK
    J Infect Public Health; 2008; 1(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 20701847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Analysis of needlestick and sharps injuries among medical staff in upper first-class hospital].
    Gu Y; Chen C; Cheng KP; Tu ZB; Zhang XJ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 31(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 23433157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Needlestick and sharps injuries: practice update.
    Adams D
    Nurs Stand; 2012 May 16-22; 26(37):49-57; quiz 58. PubMed ID: 22787891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries among hospital-based healthcare workers in the United States, 1997-1998.
    Panlilio AL; Orelien JG; Srivastava PU; Jagger J; Cohn RD; Cardo DM; ;
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 25(7):556-62. PubMed ID: 15301027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Needle sticks and adverse outcomes in office-based allergy practices.
    Kanter LJ; Siegel C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2003 Apr; 90(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 12722959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Provision and use of personal protective equipment and safety devices in the National Study to Prevent Blood Exposure in Paramedics.
    Mathews R; Leiss JK; Lyden JT; Sousa S; Ratcliffe JM; Jagger J
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):743-9. PubMed ID: 18834754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model.
    Hanmore E; Maclaine G; Garin F; Alonso A; Leroy N; Ruff L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Nov; 13():489. PubMed ID: 24274747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharp object injuries.
    Lu Y; Senthilselvan A; Joffe AM; Beach J
    Occup Med (Lond); 2015 Jan; 65(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25344960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety needles. New requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration bloodborne pathogens rule.
    Cuny EJ; Fredekind R; Budenz AW
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 27(7):525-30. PubMed ID: 10530110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Needlesticks: who pays the price when costs are cut on safety.
    Pallatroni L
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jul; 30(7):30-1, 34-6, 88 passim. PubMed ID: 10182630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.