146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917975)
1. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese.
Sousa B
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2013; 25(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23917975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients.
Kim E; Choi M; Lee J; Kim YA
Healthc Inform Res; 2013 Dec; 19(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 24523990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive validity of the EVARUCI scale to evaluate risk for pressure injury in critical care patients.
de Souza MFC; Zanei SSV; Whitaker IY
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(Sup8):clxi-clxv. PubMed ID: 37561701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A comparative study on the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales].
Lee YH; Jeong IS; Jeon SS
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2003 Apr; 33(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 15314444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
Lima-Serrano M; González-Méndez MI; Martín-Castaño C; Alonso-Araujo I; Lima-Rodríguez JS
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28215408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers in Critical Care Patients.
Deng X; Yu T; Hu A
Crit Care Nurse; 2017 Aug; 37(4):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 28765361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.
Roca-Biosca A; Rubio-Rico L; Fernández MIM; Grau NG; Garijo GT; Fernández FPG
J Wound Care; 2017 Sep; 26(9):528-536. PubMed ID: 28880761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records.
Jin Y; Piao J; Lee SM
Res Nurs Health; 2015 Apr; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 25556557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Therapeutic hypothermia and pressure ulcer risk in critically ill intensive care patients: A retrospective study.
Ahtiala M; Laitio R; Soppi E
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2018 Jun; 46():80-85. PubMed ID: 29653887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
